|
The welfare of the people ... has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience. Albert Camus "So we're watching this very carefully in anticipation of the fact that for the first time, in Australia, laws will need to be used on a scale that will present a different experience for Australia." Attorney General, Christian Porter, Doorstop - Parliament House, 3 March 2020 Mike Pompeo calls pandemic a "live exercise" to which sotto voce Trump says, "You should have let us know," (as if he didn't already know). Below are a number of indicators that the alleged coronavirus pandemic is, essentially, a globally orchestrated "live exercise" in managing a pandemic (preceded in October last year by Event 201, a "pandemic tabletop exercise"). We can infer that the alleged purpose of this exercise is really a flimsy pretext for fear-mongering instigated by the global power elite in order to exercise better control - there are about 8,500 of them and 7 billion of us. The scope of social control laid bare by this pandemic is truly scary. What social controls will be implemented and how this event will be used as a pretext for blaming looming economic problems only time will tell. Most importantly, however, the power elite always give us the chance to opt out of the response they wish to instil in us. Whenever they hoax us, they always provide deliberate signs, for example, obvious signs of fakery, over-the-top ridiculousness, contradictions, different versions of the story, physical impossibilities, poor expression, grammar and spelling (beyond what might be termed "sloppy journalism"), smiling grievers, lack of explanation where it is expected, Masonic numbers and symbols, the actual truth (or distorted version of it), etc. They are also meticulous in never faking a single piece of evidence so well that it can be used by someone who believes their story to brandish it in defence of it. See They Tell Us Clearly for examples. As responsible citizens it is our duty to call out the power elite when we can identify a very large number of anomalies in the story they drown us in with, additionally, not a single skerrick of evidence to support it. Generally, we can say that there is no clear evidence of the reality of a coronavirus pandemic. We are told of deaths and infections but all we see are lots of the general population and medical staff running around in masks and other protective gear. a man lying on a hospital floor and a person, most unrealistically, falling flat on their face. There is nothing that favours "real" over "live exercise" for a coronavirus pandemic while there is much that favours "live exercise" (assuming we include deliberate anomalies as part of the MO of a "live exercise") over "real". I ask the reader to consider this very important question: when there are clear anomalies in a story that undermine its reality, what reason is there to believe any part of it without clear evidence? See also 9/11 and COVID-19: The Parallels and Debunking the debunkers: Exposure of fraud stands strong We can also see this Trauma-based Mind Control Psychological Operation in the form of a "live" pandemic exercise as a Problem > Reaction > Solution scenario. 1. Invent a problem - Terrorism, financial crisis, etc. 2. Fabricate a response that isn't commensurate (even if the problem were real) but people will still go along with - Let the mainstream media only broadcast/print the side of the problem you want to show 3. Enforce a solution that also doesn't make sense (even if the problem were real) but people will still comply with - wars, corporate tax-cuts, welfare budget cuts, etc. Problem > Reaction > Solution scenarios date from at least the Roman emperor, Diocletian. "Diocletian’s vice-emperor, Galerius, didn’t have a hard time in persuading him that if a Palace were just to burn down, Diocletian could really accelerate his crusade against the Christians. Just by coincidence, twice within sixteen days toward the end of February, Diocletian’s palace in Nicomedia burned. The Christians were immediately blamed." Below argument is made under the following topics: PRE-PANDEMIC MANUFACTURED PROBLEM - VIRUS PANDEMIC 1. How to pull off a "pandemic" 2. Scientific fraud Unscientific haste in determining existence of virus Unscientific haste in developing an unfit-for-purpose test for the alleged virus Absence of scientific work showing virus purification Absence of scientific work showing causal link between alleged virus (SARS-CoV-2) and virus illness (COVID-19) PCR test unfit for purpose regardless of existence of virus 3. Numbers of cases and mortality 4. Excess mortality spikes caused by interventions? 5. Pseudoscience REACTION - Relentless media, masks, social distancing, lockdowns 1. Confusing guidelines 2. Response - incommensurate regardless of virus reality SOLUTION 1. Vaccination 2. The Great Reset PSYOP FEATURES 1. Patients - no symptoms/miraculous recoveries 2. Unconvincing loved ones 3. Hoax within a hoax 4. In-your-face anomalies 5. On a continuum PSYCHOLOGY - WHY PEOPLE BUY INTO THE NARRATIVE OTHER COMMENTARY PRE-PANDEMIC
MANUFACTURED PROBLEM - VIRUS PANDEMIC 1. How to pull off a "pandemic" How They Pulled Off The ‘Pandemic’ – An Animated Film Explanation By David Icke (15 mins) 12 Steps to Create your own Pandemic - Nils Nilsen 2. Scientific fraud Unscientific haste in determining existence of virus David Rasnick, PhD, who has two decades' experience in the pharmaceutical/biotech industry, explains here how the determination that a new virus has appeared is made too quickly and on too scant and unindicative information: David on YouTube (10 mins) - short extract below. "As of January 2020, the China office of WHO recorded 44 patients with pneumonia of unknown cause. Just four days later Fan Wu and colleagues in China claimed they discovered a coronavirus, a type of cold virus, in a 41-year-old man. It wasn't long before that virus was officially declared the cause of those pneumonias. But here's the question: what was so important about those 44 cases in a country that has over a million pneumonias every year. It is common knowledge that pneumonia can be caused by lots of things: simply being older, medically compromised or a patient in a hospital puts one at risk of developing pneumonia. Going from a handful of pneumonias to identifying a new virus from a single individual in a matter of days does not even come close to satisfying minimal scientific standards. It is very difficult and time-consuming to prove the existence of a new virus. It is even more difficult to prove it causes pneumonia or anything else but it is impossible to do any of that if you don't have authentic virus to begin with. Virologist, Charles Calisher, at Colorado State University, was asked last May [2020] if he knew of even one paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally purified. His short email was, "I know of no such publication. I have kept an eye out for one." In her video, Once Upon a Time in Wuhan, Dr Sam Bailey from NZ also gives an excellent analysis of the scientific fraud shown in determining the existence of a new virus in Wuhan. Unscientific haste in developing an unfit-for-purpose test for the alleged virus Pandemic timeline - Just two days after announcement of 7 SARS cases in China, Christian Drosten in Germany testified that as of January 1, 2020, he had developed a genetic detection method to reliably prove the presence of the new corona virus in humans. Unscientific method used to claim isolation of virus, unfitness of PCR test, genome sequence created by computer, and other Two independent journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, show in their article, COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless, that the alleged virus, SARS-CoV-2 has not been purified. They questioned four science teams who have produced papers alleging virus isolation on whether their electron microscopy shows purified virus particles and all four admitted they didn't. See section in article titled, "No proof that RNA strand is of viral origin". Note that the alleged debunking of the above article was made by alleged fact-checker PolitiFact which, in turn, was rebutted by the article authors and to which PolitiFact had no response. Even a layperson is able to rebut the PolitiFact "debunking" as the quality is so poor (see Debunking the Debunkers: COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless). Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter along with scientist, Dr Stefano Scoglio, have published a further article, Phantom Virus: In search of Sars-CoV-2, which no fact-checker or scientist I've approached will touch with a 50-foot barge pole. Various institutions around the world including in the US, New Zealand, Australia, the UK, England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland, Denmark, European CDC, Slovenia have responded to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests that they do not have on record proof of isolation of the alleged, SARS-CoV-2. In the three blog posts below, Dr Saeed Qureshi, winner of three prestigious science awards, Life-time Achievement Award (2015, Indus Foundation, India); 2007 Deputy Minister’s (Health Canada) Award of Excellence in Science and Excellence in Science Award (2007, Health Canada with 30 years experience as a chemist with regulatory body, Health Canada, has written critiques of the science put forward for isolation below. When “isolation of a virus” is not the isolation Isolation and characterization of the virus (SARS-CoV-2) - critique of paper published in the MJA alleging isolation of the virus from a patient CDC virus testing and isolation claims for SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 - critique of paper published by the CDC alleging isolation of the virus from a patient We also see strange omissions of reference to isolation of virus from alleged source, for example, from a "German traveller" in paper, Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS and SARS in a non-human primate model (note similar glaring omission of reference to isolation of virus from alleged source, a "fatal SARS case", in a "brief communication" published by Nature on the 2003 SARS, Koch’s postulates fulfilled for SARS virus). Absence of scientific work showing causal link between alleged virus (SARS-CoV-2) and virus illness (COVID-19) In their article, Scientists Have Utterly Failed to Prove that the Coronavirus Fulfills Koch’s Postulates, microbiologist/journalist Rosemary Frei and freelance writer, Amory Devereux, evaluate the sparse literature produced on a causal link between the alleged SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 and show how none indicates the correct scientific protocols have been followed to show a causal link. Of course, if the alleged COVID had a distinctive set of symptoms purification of virus and causal link would not be so important. With a distinctive set of symptoms we perhaps could reasonably infer a viral cause but, significantly, COVID-19 does not have a distinctive set of symptoms as indicated clearly on the CDC website. At this point, without any other clear evidence, we have no reason to believe in the existence of the alleged virus, the virus illness or the pandemic. In the absence of evidence of a pandemic (which, we will find is indeed the case on examination) there is simply no reason at all to believe in the existence of the alleged virus (SARS-CoV-2) or virus illness (COVID-19). Scientific fraud in use of PCR testing As there is no evidence of the virus, we have to wonder what is done to produce positive test results and what they mean. The article referenced in Point 3, COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless, shows how meaningless the test results are. A summary of problems with this test outside the fact that the evidence shows that we have no reason to believe the nominated virus exists to test for in the first place. --- As admitted by Australian infectious diseases expert, Sanjaya Senanayake there is no gold standard test for the alleged COVID-19. Immediately, without a gold standard test, the PCR test's fitness for purpose is called into question. --- The PCR test is inappropriate for viral testing (its purpose was manufacturing not testing). Clear example: Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t. --- No clear evidence of origin of RNA used in test which accords with the fact that there is no evidence of virus purification (Point 3). --- Test results are irrational (many individuals producing different results on multiple tests) which would only be expected when the testing method used is against scientific testing protocol --- The test contains "q" in its name, RT-qPCR, which should stand for quantitative, however, it is admitted the test is qualitative meaning it cannot test viral load which means they cannot test how many viral particles are carried in the body. For people to be considered infected a viral load needs to be determined. --- High Cycle Quantification (Cq) values undermine validity of test and some PCR tests have high Cq values (Drosten test has 45). The inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, has this to say: "If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR." --- Before starting with PCR, in the case of presumed RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, the RNA must be converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase—hence the “RT” at the beginning of “PCR” or “qPCR,” but this transformation process is “widely recognized as inefficient and variable,” I highly recommend the 17-minute video, The Truth about PCR Tests, by NZ medical doctor, Sam Bailey, and, in fact, recommend all her videos related to the alleged pandemic. 3. Numbers of cases and mortality Below is evidence showing how easy it is to falsely create a sense of pandemic by using a coronavirus: They're very common in any case and most people may be carrying a small amount of coronaviruses If you test only very sick people they are bound to have the virus but this doesn't mean that that's what making them sick or what kills them if they die. Italy admits fudging numbers by assigning deaths to people who also have serious health conditions. China's numbers were too predictable which doesn't happen with real data. Those who've recovered from the virus (the vast majority) are not being removed in updated statistics. CORONAVIRUS IDEAL FOR FUDGING THE NUMBERS
Commenter on Off-Guardian articles on COVID-19, VirusGuy, explains how easy it is to "create" a pandemic from a coronavirus. (While the moniker "VirusGuy" may undermine credibility to a degree I think we can accept that the poster may be concerned about his job and rather than judge by credentials look at what he says which tends to align with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg's words in link below.) Coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen. If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus. They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common. There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time. All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease. Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die. You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR (Case Fatality Rate) higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on. Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist. Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically. Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people you are mislabelling – your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic. But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways. 1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead. 2. You can tell people that ‘minimising’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers. 3. You can talk bullshittery about r0 numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience. 4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptomless cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen Take these simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks. FORMER HEAD OF GERMAN HEALTH, DR WOLFGANG WODARG, SAYS VIRUS TESTING EXPOSES EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES SCAM
As chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, co-signed a proposed resolution on December 18, 2009, which was briefly discussed in January 2010 in an emergency debate and called for an inquiry into alleged undue influence exerted by pharmaceutical companies on the World Health Organization’s global H1N1 flu campaign. In this video, Wodarg explains how testing of this alleged new virus has been conducted in an invalid manner and all are getting on board with the myth, just like The Emperor's New Clothes. ITALY'S AND CHINA'S NUMBERS FUDGED
NUMBER OF RECOVERED NOT BEING ELIMINATED
From chiropractor, Dr Tim O'Shea's March 2020 newsletter FOXLIVE 29 FEB Last Saturday, 29 Feb, President Trump, Mike Pence, Alex Azar, and Toni Fauci held a press conference, carried live on Fox. [5] If you didn’t watch that show, you’re not really interested in coronavirus. The first thing we learned is that at present there are only 22 cases of the “novel” virus in the entire United States. Let that fact sink in. Out of almost 350 million people. . ACKNOWLEDGING THE CURED That was the very first time a major news channel acknowledged that coronavirus wasn’t a very serious disease, because the majority of cases recovered completely in a couple of weeks. Just like the flu. And the cured should then be deducted from the statistics. No one else does that. Virtually every other story in all media for the past three months simply piles the cases up, week after week, continuing to add to a growing list, making no allowance for patients that are no longer sick. Which is 99.9% of them. This has been a brand new trick with this particular Boutique Epidemic – disregarding the cured. A tipoff to the underlying agenda. Result: it looks as though numbers are increasing out of control and it’s a growing global epidemic. This deliberately misleading tactic explains why reported numbers for coronavirus are all over the map, depending on the source. The whole tone of that Saturday’s Fox press conference was in stark contrast to everyday news reports on coronavirus, since it all began. Did you notice that? It was night and day. For once here were some very informed people – heads of HHS, NIH, the President – all saying the same thing – that Americans should go back to work and not worry about it, that the risk in this country was minimal, if that. Seriously, do you even know of one person with coronavirus? Their mood was the polar opposite of all other media stories. Across the board the four speakers were very measured, calm, and consistent with the facts. [5] They all agreed that even though there may be more cases appearing, for the most part it’s not a serious threat to public health. Mainly because it’s no more serious a disease than the flu, except in the cases of the debilitated. That was the very first time a major news channel acknowledged that coronavirus wasn’t a very serious disease, because the majority of cases recovered completely in a couple of weeks. Just like the flu. And the cured should then be deducted from the statistics. No one else does that. Virtually every other story in all media for the past three months simply piles the cases up, week after week, continuing to add to a growing list, making no allowance for patients that are no longer sick. Which is 99.9% of them. This has been a brand new trick with this particular Boutique Epidemic – disregarding the cured. A tipoff to the underlying agenda. Result: it looks as though numbers are increasing out of control and it’s a growing global epidemic. This deliberately misleading tactic explains why reported numbers for coronavirus are all over the map, depending on the source. The whole tone of that Saturday’s Fox press conference was in stark contrast to everyday news reports on coronavirus, since it all began. Did you notice that? It was night and day. For once here were some very informed people – heads of HHS, NIH, the President – all saying the same thing – that Americans should go back to work and not worry about it, that the risk in this country was minimal, if that. Seriously, do you even know of one person with coronavirus? Their mood was the polar opposite of all other media stories. Across the board the four speakers were very measured, calm, and consistent with the facts. [5] They all agreed that even though there may be more cases appearing, for the most part it’s not a serious threat to public health. Mainly because it’s no more serious a disease than the flu, except in the cases of the debilitated. Doctors given guidelines to "presume" COVID-19 as cause of death
Dr Scott Jensen, a practising MD and Minnesota senator, received a document from the the Vital Statistics Agency giving guidance on assigning deaths as "presumed" from COVID-19 without patient having been tested.
4. Excess mortality spikes caused by interventions? In this video, NZ MD, Sam Bailey, outlines how the April 2020 spike in certain countries in Europe can be explained by two aggressive treatment trials, the WHO Solidarity program and the Oxford Recovery trial which involved very high doses of particular drugs including a 2400 mg dose of hydroxychloroquine which is 400 mg above the level considered to be overdose - 2000 mg. She points out, for example, that Spain had a big spike while the spike of its neighbour, Portugal, was lower than its 2017 spike - Spain implemented one of the programs while Portugal didn't. NOTE: Sam doesn't say the treatment programs CAUSED the spikes, she just points out a degree of correlation and a possible explanation other than COVID. Obviously, where there are excess deaths and no explanation other than the alleged COVID can be pointed to, COVID as cause will seem compelling whereas if we can see other possible causes we aren't so beguiled by COVID being cause. In this article, Oxford, Recovery et Solidarity: Overdosage in two clinical trials with acts considered criminal?, in France Soir by Le Collectif Citoyen they state in no uncertain terms that they believe the aggressive drug trials are actually responsible for deaths. 5. Pseudoscience There are ways to make information look as if it means things it doesn't. CRITIQUE OF ARTICLE, CORONAVIRUS: WHY YOU MUST ACT NOW, BY TOMAS PUEYO
Commenter on Off-Guardian articles on COVID-19, VirusGuy, in critiquing the article, Coronavirus: why you must act now, by Tomas Pueyo explains how it is easy to make things look significant which aren't. (While the moniker "VirusGuy" may undermine credibility to a degree I think we can accept that the poster may be concerned about his job and rather than judge by credentials look at what he says which tends to align with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg's words in link below.) That article is being widely promoted and is an attempt, in my view, to confuse ordinary people who are not scientists or epidemiologists into believing they are being given alarming new information when they are not. I believe it to be a well-crafted and cynical effort. If you break down the actual information provided therein it is basically a very long elucidation of the self-evident fact that in any viral cluster there will be newly emerging clinical and subclinical cases, particularly in the emergent phase, that are not yet incorporated into the stats. In other words there is a time lag between cases developing and being officially recognised. This is the situation with everything, every pathogen, every minor or major contagion cluster. Every cold outbreak, every viral gastroenteritis outbreak. It is absolutely and perfectly normal. As cases peak and begin to dwindle this lag also becomes less, until eventually new cases are negligible. This also is normal. I believe this article to be a sponsored disinformation effort, attempts to present this normal, regular aspect of epidemiology as if it were something unique and terrifying. You will note it never actually says so, but it implies it. It also uses language and numerous graphs to create a confusing impression of hard-to-assimilate information that is actually no more than noise. This is why I believe it to be disinformation, because this is a known methodology of blinding the public with pseudoscience. Like so: Take a commonly accepted common sense fact (e.g. that there is going to be a lag between sicknesses happening and being assimilated into stats), present it as if it were shocking and new and illustrate it with graphs that do nothing but serve to hide the basic and uncontested nature of the fact being hyped. Draw extreme conclusions or imply them. Above all, make your opening statement and closing statement frightening and much easier to assimilate than the word salad in between. People will read your first sentences, scroll through the bewildering graphs to the end, read your last sentence, be glad they can at least understand this and assume the rest of your study is too smart and science-based for them. They will of course accept your conclusions. This article we are discussing is an exemplar of this method. The simple fact of lag between clinical development and diagnosis turned into a bewildering forest of scary seeming stats and a completely unsupported conclusion. No one should give it time. It’s nonsense dressed up in ways known to have maximum psychological effects. As I say in my other lengthy post today I do not believe there is a novel coronavirus causing a pandemic. I believe it is a global scam with very concerning aims. I think the low numbes of cases reflect this. I think articles such as this one are intended to obscure these low numbers with chilling threats of future very high numbers. The aim is to make the threat seem so imminent it frightens people enough so they stop pointing out the real numbers don’t fit with the pandemic story. REACTION - Relentless media, masks, social distancing, lockdowns 1. Confusing behaviour guidelines A list of confusing guidelines has been created by Dorset Eye (also see below) with regard to our behaviour. While the list is humorous it nevertheless raises questions about the reality of the event if it's possible for such contradiction in the guidelines. Surely, if we were really at risk the powers that be would have worked out more straightforward guidelines. Dorset Eye - the (un) official coronavirus guidelines
The (un) official Coronavirus guidelines 1. You MUST NOT leave the house for any reason, but if you have a reason, you can leave the house 2. Masks are useless at protecting you against the virus, but you may have to wear one because it can save lives, but they may not work, but they may be mandatory, but maybe not 3. Shops are closed, except those shops that are open 4. You must not go to work but you can get another job and go to work 5. You should not go to the Drs or to the hospital unless you have to go there, unless you are too poorly to go there 6. This virus can kill people, but don’t be scared of it. It can only kill those people who are vulnerable or those people who are not vulnerable people. It’s possible to contain and control it, sometimes, except that sometimes it actually leads to a global disaster 7. Gloves won’t help, but they can still help so wear them sometimes or not 8. STAY HOME, but it’s important to go out 9. There is no shortage of groceries in the supermarkets, but there are many things missing. Sometimes you won’t need loo rolls but you should buy some just in case you need some 10. The virus has no effect on children except those children it affects 11. Animals are not affected, but there is still a cat that tested positive in Belgium in February when no one had been tested, plus a few tigers here and there… 12. Stay 2 metres away from tigers (see point 11) 13. You will have many symptoms if your get the virus, but you can also get symptoms without getting the virus, get the virus without having any symptoms or be contagious without having symptoms, or be non contagious with symptoms… 14. To help protect yourself you should eat well and exercise, but eat whatever you have on hand as it’s better not to go out shopping 15. It’s important to get fresh air but don’t go to parks but go for a walk. But don’t sit down, except if you are old, but not for too long or if you are pregnant or if you’re not old or pregnant but need to sit down. If you do sit down don’t eat your picnic 16. Don’t visit old people but you have to take care of the old people and bring them food and medication 17. If you are sick, you can go out when you are better but anyone else in your household can’t go out when you are better unless they need to go out 18. You can get restaurant food delivered to the house. These deliveries are safe. But groceries you bring back to your house have to be decontaminated outside for 3 hours including Pizza… 19. You can’t see your older mother or grandmother, but they can take a taxi and meet an older taxi driver 20. You are safe if you maintain the safe social distance when out but you can’t go out with friends or strangers at the safe social distance 21. The virus remains active on different surfaces for two hours … or four hours… six hours… I mean days, not hours… But it needs a damp environment. Or a cold environment that is warm and dry… in the air, as long as the air is not plastic 22. Schools are closed so you need to home educate your children, unless you can send them to school because you’re not at home. If you are at home you can home educate your children using various portals and virtual class rooms, unless you have poor internet, or more than one child and only one computer, or you are working from home. Baking cakes can be considered maths, science or art. If you are home educating you can include household chores to be education. If you are home educating you can start drinking at 10am 23. If you are not home educating children you can also start drinking at 10am 24. The number of corona related deaths will be announced daily but we don’t know how many people are infected as they are only testing those who are almost dead to find out if that’s what they will die of… the people who die of corona who aren’t counted won’t be counted 25. You should stay in locked down until the virus stops infecting people but it will only stop infecting people if we all get infected so it’s important we get infected and some don’t get infected 26. You can join your neighbours for a street party and turn your music up for an outside disco and your neighbours won’t call the police. People in another street are allowed to call the police about your music 27. No business will go down due to Coronavirus except those businesses that will go down due to Coronavirus Hope this helps. This video made by Australian comedian, Jimmy Rees, also exposes the truly mindblowing illogicality of the covid rules in Australia which can surely only addle people's brains. 2. Masks, lockdowns, social distancing - no validity Even if we disregard evidence that PCR is ineffective in testing for the virus and that the numbers are fudged, the response is vastly incommensurate. Response incommensurate regardless of virus reality
Even if we were able to isolate and show that COVID-19 existed, there is nothing in the epidemiology we are being presented with to justify any quarantine measures let alone the utterly insane measures we are seeing. Even if you don’t know anything about epidemiology can you not comprehend some basic statistics? We don’t quarantine flu with an r0 of about the same as this supposed novel covi and numbers of clinical cases hugely surpass it. We accept that more than half a million deaths will happen from flu but need to shield people from a few thousand covi deaths to the point of shutting down the whole of society. Why would this be the case? Are you less dead if the flu kills you? The hysteria and gullibility are breathtaking. And please do not tell me we need to act while the numbers are small, because that is our media talking through you and not your own thinking. Stop. Consider. Less than 1% of Wuhan’s population was clinically infected with this supposed novel covi. 3% of that 1% died. That is not the profile of a new killer pathogen. It is not the profile of anything you need extreme quarantine to beat. It is the profile of either a new weakly infective pathogen, or, as I strongly suspect, a known pathogen with good herd immunity. A flu virus in fact. SOLUTION I'm a bit slow at working out exactly what the "solution" is but I'll just put a couple of links below. 1. Vaccine As there's no evidence of a virus, of course, there is no requirement for a vaccine ... but just how bad is it? I recommend Jon Rappoport's blog pages on the vaccine. Australian government, Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), listing of reported adverse effects of COVID vaccines up to 7/8/21. The ability to download reports on adverse effects of the vaccines has now been removed although adverse effects for other medicines is still possible. Australian whistleblowing nurses and other staff describe the shocking harm and death being caused by the vaccine. 2. The Great Reset - whatever that will pan out to be PSYOP FEATURES 1. Sufferers: show no symptoms or behave unconvincingly / allege miraculous recoveries The sufferers below show no symptoms or behave unconvincingly or allege ludicrous miraculous recoveries. This sort of obviousness is expected in psychological operations. "Miracle survivors" are common in many events see Point 3 They tell us clearly. No indication of symptoms or behave unconvincingly / miracle survivors
No indication of symptoms or behaviour unconvincing — 40-year-old Ulster pastor not showing signs of symptoms — 41-year-old Italian not showing signs of symptoms — 39-year-old London patient, Tara Jane Langston, in ICU. 1. Completely against protocol that a COVID-19 patient would be in ICU coughing all over the place infecting other ICU patients. 2. If she's ill enough to be in ICU it seems very odd that she'd be well enough for an interview not to mention the fact that surely interviewing in ICU would also be completely against protocol. 3. Notice how when she coughs her head goes out of view (when she coughs away the cough sounds real but there's nothing to say it's not inserted audio). She shows us her wrist with what looks like taping of tubes and says, “They’ve had to sew that into my artery.” That makes no sense. She tells us she has a cannula, another cannula and a catheter. The nasal cannula makes sense but it's difficult to know what she'd need the other cannula and catheter for. Her laboured breathing is not particularly convincing. 4. In this article in the Guardian, Woman who filmed coronavirus warning receives online abuse, we are told: "And then the trauma was compounded by online trolls who flooded the family’s inbox with messages accusing them of a hoax." There are many, many instances of "hoax" being mentioned in the media one way or another - a typical feature of psyops. Trump told us too: "One of my people came up to me and said, “Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia.” That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything. They tried it over and over. They’d been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning. They lost. It’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax." Fascinating analysis by "Inspector Norf" of Tara Jane Langston's past acting experience and her appearance as the patient in a video produced in a slick short film published 11 days after the video she had taken of herself in ICU went viral. Article in the Daily Mail about Tara Jane appearing in reality show, The Bridge. Note that some commenters who don't indicate they think COVID is a hoax show skepticism of Tara Jane's story. — Australian hire-car driver who drove home a passenger on the Ruby Princess and became infected, not showing signs of symptoms. We also wonder why the footage of her is such poor quality - devices don't take such poor quality footage these days. She said that her passenger had letters on her saying she was OK. You wonder why the driver didn't check the letters and if the passenger did have a letter how did she get this letter because we are told that the passengers were let off simply because they were considered low risk. We are not told elsewhere that they were all given letters. — 3 Americans, showing zero signs of symptoms Miracle survivors -- 82 year-old North Staffordshire grandfather makes miracle recovery - with antibiotics. How is this possible if antibiotics are said not to be a cure? — 90 year-old Washington grandmother makes miracle recovery from "death's door", potato soup being her secret weapon. No images of her suggest she is ill. A 52 year-old MIami man, "gaspin'", "on the brink of death" and thinking his "days were done" recovers miraculously with anti-malarial, chloroquine. Of course, the media is simply reporting what the alleged sufferers feel has helped them ... but surely for such a serious problem if potato soup and chloroquine have not been scientifically proven to help sufferers shouldn't the media be warning viewers? 2. Unconvincing husband of Ruby Princess passenger who allegedly died of COVID-19 Unconvincing loved one
Interview with Graeme Lake, Ruby Princess passenger. To celebrate her 75th birthday, Graeme went on a cruise with his wife, Karla, who allegedly died from COVID-19 after disembarking the ship. Anomalies: 1. The reporter says Karla started showing symptoms at Day 8 of the 13-day cruise while Graeme says he believed she picked up the virus on the 2rd or 3rd day before the trip ended. Graeme also mentions that they both had a dry cough but Karla’s kept getting worse and worse. He says, “I kept saying, ‘you’re coughing bad’. I didn’t take any notice.” Comment: Graeme’s estimation of when she picked up the bug doesn’t match with the reporter or with the sense of a cough going on for a few days on the boat. If he said he "kept saying, 'you're coughing bad'" how can he then say that he didn’t take any notice. Obviously, he noticed. Generally, when people say they kept repeating something to a person the obvious follow-on is it that the person they have been addressing didn't take any notice. 2. We are told Karla ended up in Caboolture hospital at which point Graeme says, “She was coughing but we talked and she said she’s fighting … and she was fighting.” This doesn’t really make sense. How was she fighting simply "coughing"? 3. We are told she went into ICU and 10 days later she was dead, however, we are given no sense of trajectory from dry cough to death. Why couldn't she have been saved in ICU? What symptoms led her to death? 4. He says, “This cruise has ruined us, ruined her completely.” Strange to say “us” and not to repeat it with “ruined” but to switch to “her” the second time. Also, to use the word ruin in relation to death. Death is beyond ruin. 5. He says, “It’s really devastated. Even now I’m still struggling.” It’s odd to use the word devastated in this context without following it with “me” or “us” (family) and how can he say “still struggling” when his wife has only just died. 3. In-your-face anomalies Snakes and pangolins
Two species of snake, Chinese cobra and many-banded krait, are wildlife reservoirs of virus? Chinese researchers, led by Wei Ji, a microbiologist at Peking University Health Science Center’s School of Basic Medical Sciences state, “the codons preferred by 2019-nCoV [are] those preferred by a handful of potential hosts that include: humans, bats, chickens, hedgehogs, pangolins, and two species of snakes”. When it is said about coronaviruses … "Coronaviruses are a group of viruses that cause diseases in mammals and birds. In humans, the viruses cause respiratory infections which are typically mild including the common cold but rarer forms like SARS and MERS can be lethal. In cows and pigs they may cause diarrhea, while in chickens they can cause an upper respiratory disease. There are no vaccines or antiviral drugs that are approved for prevention or treatment" ...
Chinese snake theory peer-reviewed and published in journal. Said of by Australian zoologist "It's complete garbage." We are told in the research article Wei Ji and his team published in the Journal of Medical Virology: Results obtained from our analyses suggest that the 2019‐nCoV appears to be a recombinant virus between the bat coronavirus and an origin‐unknown coronavirus. The recombination occurred within the viral spike glycoprotein, which recognizes cell surface receptor. Additionally, our findings suggest that snake is the most probable wildlife animal reservoir for the 2019‐nCoV based on its RSCU bias resembling snake compared to other animals. But in response to this paper: “It’s complete garbage,” says Edward Holmes, a zoologist at the University of Sydney’s Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, who specializes in emerging RNA viruses, a class that includes coronaviruses like 2019-nCoV.
Critically-endangered pangolins on sale and civet cat shown (alleged SARS carrier) Can it be true that critically endangered pangolins are on sale at Wuhan market and why do they show us a civet cat (the alleged source of SARS) in the photo when the caption refers to pangolins? Hospitals in record time
Story 2: Building of a hospital from scratch - I've seen media reports for 4 days, 6 days, 9 days and 10 days!
China is building special coronavirus hospital to treat 1,000 in just SIX DAYS -The Mirror, 26 January, 2020 Amazingly, according to the time-lapse video below, it seems the hospital was, in fact, built in a very short period but however short the period was a great deal of time in planning and pre-fabrication would have had to occur. This hospital was planned, it wasn't built in response to the sudden coronavirus pandemic. And the hospital will most certainly not be just equipped to handle coronavirus cases whatever the number of cases is. Contradictory and implausible stories about hospitals being set up
We are presented with two contradictory and equally implausible stories about a "coronavirus" hospital being set up Story 1: Conversion of empty building to hospital China opens 1,000-bed coronavirus hospital after just 48 hours of construction - Metro - 29 January 2020 The Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Centre started receiving patients at 10.30pm last night after workers spent just 48 hours converting an empty building. In my opinion, the "empty buildings" below look like drawings and certainly give no sense of having been converted into a hospital. 
Story 2: Building of a hospital from scratch - I've seen media reports for 4 days, 6 days, 9 days and 10 days!
China is building special coronavirus hospital to treat 1,000 in just SIX DAYS -The Mirror, 26 January, 2020 Amazingly, according to the time-lapse video below, it seems the hospital was, in fact, built in a very short period but however short the period was a great deal of time in planning and pre-fabrication would have had to occur. This hospital was planned, it wasn't built in response to the sudden coronavirus pandemic. And the hospital will most certainly not be just equipped to handle coronavirus cases whatever the number of cases is. Strange patients
People: lying on floor, falling flat on face, dead on street Do you find this person laid out on the floor and another falling flat on their face convincing as sufferers? And what about the man stretched out in the video shown within the article, Coronavirus: Man found dead in street in face mask in shocking image in the Independent, Anomalies in interview with asymptomatic cruise ship passenger There are a number of anomalies to be found in this 10-minute interview conducted by a CBC news anchor with Rebecca Frasure, a Diamond Princess passenger.
4. Recognised hoax within alleged real event A common feature of hoaxes is to fabricate a "recognised" hoax within the larger unrecognised hoax. And there is absolutely no shortage of "hoaxes" within a hoax in the case of this alleged pandemic. And there is, of course, Donald Trump's infamous mention in relation to the Democrats. Do an internet search and you will be greeted by thousands of responses - all the better to hide information calling out the pandemic as a hoax, no? In the article below, we're told that a passenger declaring he had the coronavirus caused the pilot to return to Toronto (2 hours into a 4 hour flight to Montego Bay), however, once arrived back in Toronto the passenger was declared not to be suffering from the virus. One wonders on what basis it was decided there was sufficient cause for concern to turn the flight around. Flight records show that WestJet flight 2702 did indeed return to Toronto, however, this doesn't mean that the return wasn't planned and staged as part of the "live exercise". Perhaps it serves as advertising for WestJet, promoting the message they take the utmost care. Woman frustrated as coronavirus hoax forces plane to turn around - Bradford Today (Canadian local press), 5 February 2020 5. Is the Coronavirus scare just one on a continuum?
Evidence of staging for both Ebola and Corona. (5 min) Video on Coronavirus Zika Ebola Anthrax (33 min) "MASS FORMATION" - WHY PEOPLE BUY INTO THE NARRATIVE Written translation of interview in Dutch with Professor of Clinical Psychology at Ghent University, Mattias Desmet Video of interview in English with Desmet OTHER COMMENTARY
448 Comments
You tell me.
(See also Did MH-17 crash in Eastern Ukraine? and Did PS-752 crash in Tehran?) Seriously, they really take the mickey with this one. Reporter, Tori Campbell of KTVU, a San Francisco TV station, reads out the following four pilots' names. Firstly, why four pilots? Aren't there usually only a pilot and co-pilot? Captain Sum Ting Wong Wi Tu Lo Ho Lee Fuk Bang Ding Ow Wikipedia says: San Francisco television station KTVU fell victim to “a prank”[144][145][146] in which then-news-anchor Tori Campbell reported a quartet of phonetic double entendres as the actual names of the flight crew. The names reported were Sum Ting Wong (“something[‘s] wrong”), Wi Tu Lo (“we[‘re] too low”), Ho Lee Fuk (“holy fuck”), and Bang Ding Ow (onomatopoeia for crashing sound and expression of pain). The prank has been described as racist and insensitive. “... fell victim to a prank ...” and "... quartet of phonetic double entendres ..." Oh please. If it were a real plane disaster this prank wouldn’t have happened … and, unsurprisingly, the visual evidence does not match the description of the crash. Did MH-17 crash in eastern Ukraine?
17/1/2020
Below is evidence that the crash of MH-17 in eastern Ukraine was staged. (Also see Did PS-752 crash in Tehran? and Did Asiana Flight 24 crash in San Francisco?) 1. Absence of clear evidence of reality A major point to consider is that there is no clear evidence of reality of the crash 2. Bodies, body parts and debris The image on the left below shows dead bodies, body parts and debris in the background which show signs of fakery while the image on the right is a Spencer Tunick photograph of naked bodies for comparison. Original source of image, NRT24, no longer exists - new source although image slightly different Sputnik Images. Link to other crash photos. General:
Below are zoomed-in parts of the photo with comments:
3. Anomalies in cockpit images The damage shown in the images below of the plane cockpit area do not match: Image 1 from India Today Image 2 from Tass 1: Dirty marks around cockpit windows / 2: No dirty marks 1: Vertical hole under first window straight and does not extend / 2: Curved hole.that extends more thickly 1. Small hole under right vertical frame of second window / 2. Much more extended hole and the start of the hole a different shape 1. Little crinkling at red and blue stripes / 2. Great deal of crinkling at red and blue stripes You also have to wonder how the cockpit was severed from the rest of the plane. The edge looks cut. 4. Cube and bow-tie shaped projectiles? In the first video at this ABC News article (at 2:51), they tell us: The aeroplane was perforated by hundreds of high-energy objects shaped like cubes and bow-ties. Really, cubes and bow-ties? Wouldn’t the physics be against such military projectiles? And what would be the purpose of the two different types? Additionally, the holes in the cockpits give no indication they were made by such projectiles. 5. Raining bodies? Text accompanying a video published one year on by the Daily Mail 'It's raining bodies': Harrowing new video captures the moment traumatised couple watch MH17 victims fall from the sky as they drive past burning wreckage in Ukraine Comment: The video only shows some burning in the distance without any evidence of what the people in the video refer to. Why would they say, "It's raining bodies," when there is no footage of a plane actually crashing and while the Daily Mail reports that that is what is said these words are not presented in the subtitles. 6. The Maslins, allegedly the parents of three young children who died, are completely unconvincing Grief is not convincingly displayed. Of course, people can be experiencing grief without obviously displaying it and the alleged crash happened 5 years before this interview, however, you could never argue that the demeanour of the Maslins favours real grief over none. The father says: "I don't feel anger towards the people who fired the rocket - I feel much something much worse - I feel pity." Question: How is pity worse than anger? We are told that since the loss of their three young children they had a fourth child. The father says: "We choose to think and act positively whenever we can. The best example of that is focusing on what you have not on what you've lost." I don't find this sort of homily credible from someone who's lost three young children. Did PS-752 crash in Tehran?
16/1/2020
Joining the dots The evidence (below) shows that the crash of PS-752 was faked and this fits perfectly with what we might imagine really went down (at a very basic level) in the assassination of Soleimani. (Also see posts Did MH-17 crash in Eastern Ukraine? and Did Asiana Flight 214 crash in San Francisco?) — As it suits them both, Trump and Rouhani collude in assassination (or other method of "disappearing") of Soleimani — An expected retaliation by Iran ensues in the form of an attack on a Ukrainian airliner containing Canadian passengers causing its crash but which is, in fact, a staged crash (with the necessary collusion of the US, Iran (Rouhani), Canada and the Ukraine) — Rouhani blames Revolutionary Guards (led by Soleimani) for “accidental” shooting down of plane followed by the laying of fake charges. Rouhani will cry some crocodile tears and Trump and Rouhani will collaborate in what it is they wish to collaborate in. What doesn't make sense — US assassinates Soleimani on its lonesome — Fake plane crash (necessary collusion by the US, Iran (Rouhani), Canada and the Ukraine) — Rouhani blames Revolutionary Guards (led by Soleimani) for “accidental” shooting down of plane and now charges I was prompted to check the veracity of the PS-752 crash after reading a photographed post, "The Soleimani Assassination and Occam's Razor" contained in a tweet sent to me - click bar below for post in text form. “THE SOLEIMANI ASSASSINATION AND OCCAM’S RAZOR”
Many are calling Trump’s move taking out General Soleimani “4D Chess”. I believe there is another strategy in play. Trump has backchannels to Iran and made a deal with Rouhani to take out Iran’s General who Rouhani was already losing control over. Soleimani was acting as a lone wolf in Iraq. He was there AGAINST ORDERS from President Rouhani. Soleimani was becoming too powerful and he was using Iran’s army as his own personal mercenary force. Rouhani was slowly losing control over his own military and Trump saw this is an opportunity to make a deal with the devil. Both Trump and Iran want US forces to begin wrapping up in Iraq. Rouhani wants Soleimani dead because he is becoming uncontrolled. Trump wants Soleimani dead in order to look powerful and to snub Obama for his pardon of the war criminal. Soleimani’s death causes a vote in Iraq for US forces to leave. Now Trump can pull forces without battling in congress. Rouhani and Trump both get what they want. Rouhani gets to cry crocodile tears for his poor general, and Trump has made inroads into a deal with Iran. There will be some more back and forth fake posturing from Iran against Trump in order to save face and create plausible deniability, but ultimately Rouhani will come to the table. Iran will come to the table and agree to inspections and denuclearization in return for sanction relief. The president has become old and weary of this path and he sees Trump as his ally against the Globalists. Now is the time when Iran can come to the table and establish strong economic nationalist trade deals that are free of globalist intervention. Iran realises that their war has always been against the Rothschild banks and Rouhani realises that Trump is their enemy as well, so now is the time to make a deal. The deal must be done in secret, where both sides look like enemies in order to save face to the general public who hate each other’s guts. This will cause the price of oil to plummet below $30 by end of year. Evidence that the crash of PS-752 was faked Evidence favouring the crash of the Ukrainian airline flight, PS-752, being a faked event rather than real. Also, in tandem with that hypothesis is that they make it clear it’s fake with obvious signals and obvious lack of realism. For more on this phenomenon see They Tell Us Clearly. 1. A major point to consider is that there is no clear evidence of reality of the crash 2. There are no images of the crashed plane that convincingly show a white plane with yellow and blue livery that looks like the plane on the left although we are shown part of a tail with the UIA logo on it. 3. We see no seats or bodies as pointed out by YouTuber, Peekay. 4. The footage of the plane crashing is not convincing. 5. It is beyond irregular that bulldozers would appear on the scene so soon after the crash to massively compromise the evidence ... but as we might expect for a staged plane crash, there seems little for the dozers to do and what are all the people doing?  6. Trump says: “It was flying in a pretty rough neighbourhood”. These words are nonsensical in relation to a plane.
7. The man standing next to Trump (Point 6) ostentatiously hides a smile. (I do not regard this as “duping delight” (these people are consummate actors after all) but deliberate pretence of smiling and hiding it – a typical sign of staged events.) 8. This is a CBC interview with Ramin Alaen in Toronto whose wife delivered a baby on January 8 (the day of the crash) whose sister, Iman, and her husband, Parinaz, both allegedly died. Some of the anomalies it contains are listed below. — Parinaz is a woman’s name meaning “charming and beautiful”, from the words Pari (“fairy”, “extremely beautiful woman”) and naz (“charm”, “beauty”) so it's decidedly odd that Ramin's wife's brother-in-law is named Parinaz. — Ramin says: “They were on holidays for two weeks and – I don’t know – somehow they rushed to go back … They were to arrive in Toronto at 3pm and then they had another flight arranged to take a cruise because Parinaz won the prize from RBC [seemingly, the company he worked for]”. Comment: Why does Ramin express ignorance of not knowing the reason for their hasty return when he expresses the knowledge that they were going to take another flight from Toronto to go on a cruise. We might also ask if Iman really had to take that cruise at that time (and where it was happening in the North American winter) when her sister was having a baby. — The interviewer then, seemingly confused, refers to “her” winning the prize although Ramin has said it was her husband, Parinaz, who won it. — Then Ramin speaks of Iman having a conversation with her sister but refers to her as “he”. I know that it is common for foreign speakers to confuse pronoun gender but Ramin refers to Iman as “he” about 10 times which seems a little odd, especially considering that as soon as he starts speaking about his newborn daughter, he refers to her no problem as “she”. — Then the interviewer refers to Parinaz again, confusing him with Iman, and asks if Ramin and his wife had considered naming the baby Parinaz after his sister-in-law. Ramin responds that they did consider it. This makes sense if we consider that Parinaz is a girl’s name but not if we consider the fact that Parinaz is, allegedly, the sister’s husband. (At this point I stopped watching the interview but if others are interested they may find more anomalies in the last couple of minutes or so.) |
AuthorAnalyse the fakery the power elite is drowning us in. Archives
August 2020
Categories |
RSS Feed