|
The welfare of the people ... has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience. Albert Camus "So we're watching this very carefully in anticipation of the fact that for the first time, in Australia, laws will need to be used on a scale that will present a different experience for Australia." Attorney General, Christian Porter, Doorstop - Parliament House Below are a number of indicators that the alleged coronavirus pandemic is, essentially, a globally orchestrated "live exercise" in managing a pandemic (preceded in October last year by Event 201, a "pandemic tabletop exercise"). We can infer that the alleged purpose of this exercise is really a flimsy pretext for fear-mongering instigated by the global power elite in order to exercise better control - there are about 8,500 of them and 7 billion of us. The scope of social control laid bare by this pandemic is truly scary. What social controls will be implemented and how this event will be used as a pretext for blaming looming economic problems only time will tell. Most importantly, however, the power elite always give us the chance to opt out of the response they wish to instil in us. Whenever they hoax us, they always provide deliberate signs, for example, obvious signs of fakery, over-the-top ridiculousness, contradictions, different versions of the story, physical impossibilities, poor expression, grammar and spelling (beyond what might be termed "sloppy journalism"), smiling grievers, lack of explanation where it is expected, Masonic numbers and symbols, the actual truth (or distorted version of it), etc. They are also meticulous in never faking a single piece of evidence so well that it can be used by someone who believes their story to brandish it in defence of it. See They Tell Us Clearly for examples. As responsible citizens it is our duty to call out the power elite when we can identify a very large number of anomalies in the story they drown us in with, additionally, not a single skerrick of evidence to support it. Generally, we can say that there is no clear evidence of the reality of a coronavirus pandemic. We are told of deaths and infections but all we see are lots of the general population and medical staff running around in masks and other protective gear. a man lying on a hospital floor and a person, most unrealistically, falling flat on their face. There is nothing that favours "real" over "live exercise" for a coronavirus pandemic while there is much that favours "live exercise" (assuming we include deliberate anomalies as part of the MO of a "live exercise") over "real". I ask the reader to consider this very important question: when there are clear anomalies in a story that undermine its reality, what reason is there to believe any part of it without clear evidence? See also 9/11 and COVID-19: The Parallels and Debunking the debunkers: PCR tests are scientifically meaningless Below argument is made under the following topics:
1. Pre-pandemic
2. How to pull off a "pandemic" How They Pulled Off The ‘Pandemic’ – An Animated Film Explanation By David Icke (15 mins) 12 Steps to Create your own Pandemic - Nils Nilsen Coronavirus ideal for fudging the numbers - see Point 4 below 3. Very obvious scientific fraud relating to lack of gold standard, inappropriateness of testing method, false claims of virus purification, etc. Scientific fraud
Case for the following made in article by two independent journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless --- No distinctive specific symptoms for COVID-19 --- Admitted lack of gold standard test for COVID-19 (Australian infectious diseases expert, Sanjaya Senanayake) --- PCR test used inappropriate for viral testing (its purpose was manufacturing not testing). Clear example: Faith in Quick Test Leads to Epidemic That Wasn’t. --- No clear evidence of origin of RNA used in test --- Authors of scientific papers claiming isolation of virus admit that purification of virus not actually done and seasoned virologist admits lack of awareness of any paper showing purification of virus (also see Australian Department of Health responds to FOI request for records of isolation of virus with admission of no records). --- No evidence of what is said to be the virus, SARS-CoV-2 causing COVID-19 --- Test results are irrational (many individuals producing different results on multiple tests) which would only be expected when the testing method used is against scientific testing protocol --- The test contains "q" in its name, RT-qPCR, which should stand for quantitative, however, it is admitted the test is qualitative meaning it cannot test viral load which means they cannot test how many viral particles are carried in the body. For people to be considered infected a viral load needs to be determined. --- High Cycle Quantification (Cq) values undermine validity of test and some PCR tests have high Cq values (Drosten test has 45). The inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, has this to say: "If you have to go more than 40 cycles to amplify a single-copy gene, there is something seriously wrong with your PCR." --- Before starting with PCR, in the case of presumed RNA viruses such as SARS-CoV-2, the RNA must be converted to complementary DNA (cDNA) with the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase—hence the “RT” at the beginning of “PCR” or “qPCR,” but this transformation process is “widely recognized as inefficient and variable,” The above issues clearly show that there is no evidence at all to believe in either the virus, SARS-CoV-2 or the alleged illness COVID-19. The clear inference to be made is that all illness and death ascribed to COVID-19 is, in reality, has another cause. We also see strange omissions of reference to isolation of virus from alleged source, for example, from a "German traveller" in paper, Comparative pathogenesis of COVID-19, MERS and SARS in a non-human primate model (note similar glaring omission of reference to isolation of virus from alleged source, a "fatal SARS case", in a "brief communication" published by Nature on the 2003 SARS, Koch’s postulates fulfilled for SARS virus). TESTING NOT BEING DONE IN SANTA CLARA COUNTY!
From chiropractor, Dr Tim O'Shea's March 2020 newsletter CALIFORNIA “OUTBREAK” A few days after the Fox Live press conference, corporate media reported 4 new cases of COVID in the Bay area. This was predicted by the Fox Live conference. But there’s nothing to be worried about – no more serious than the flu. Then corporate news hysteria ramped up yet another notch. Santa Clara County’s scoreboard on its website amplified the seriousness of the four cases beyond all reason. A few days later, it was up to 20 “confirmed” cases, just in Santa Clara County. [3] Confirmed how? They don’t say. Nobody knows. At the same time another site – the California Dept. of Health – was suddenly claiming 60 cases statewide. [4] That’s 3x as many cases as in the entire country just a few days earlier. How is that possible? That’s when it hit me. How could one county in California suddenly have 3x as many cases as the entire United States after just a few days? It couldn’t. The answer is: there are simply no standard criteria. for counting cases. Plus, there was an agenda across the board to magnify the seriousness of the “epidemic” by making the most provocative, groundless predictions for the near future. [7] But always with the requisite assurance that “Santa Clara County is doing everything possible to manage and limit the outbreak…” The standard bureaucrat slogan, from sea to shining sea… FUNDING: THE HOME STRETCH So what was going on here? Then I remembered. The $8 billion in funding had just come through Congress. [6] So that means one thing: every state and federal bureaucrat in the country is now scrambling for his fair share, before the whole illusion evaporates. As it is sure to do, pretty soon. Funding – whether it’s for a vaccine, or just the illusion of “control” – funding has always been the predictable death knell for every single Boutique Epidemic. [8] The usual pattern is that media redoubles its efforts at maximum hysteria and grim prediction because they know it’s going to vanish very soon. Which we’re seeing right now, like this lame turkey from Yahoo news: “As the coronavirus spreads, one study predicts that even the best-case scenario is 15 million dead and a $2.4 trillion hit to global GDP.” [7] For the next few weeks, get ready for more like this from the pre-hominids at the corporate tabloids. This explains the new tone of desperation in media, squeezing every last drop of urgency out of an event before the Golden Goose flies away. And why more and more masks are appearing on the street and why there are shortages of bottled water, rice, etc in most Bay Area supermarkets. In the absence of verifiable cases. WHAT IF THERE’S NO CORONAVIRUS EPIDEMIC AT ALL: EXPERIMENT Hold on here. What if there is no epidemic, no new COVID disease at all, and no legitimate testing procedure for counting the “infected“? Let’s just make that hypothesis for a moment, and then try to disprove it. I started out with a little experiment. First I called Santa Clara County health department, 408) 992-4900 and after 30 minutes finally got through to someone. I asked if Santa Clara County had any facility where I could refer my patients who had the flu, where they could be tested to rule out coronavirus. The answer was unequivocal – No – Santa Clara County has no testing facility for coronavirus. My next question was, well all these numbers of coronavirus cases on your website – where are they coming from if you have no testing facility? The representative told me that people had to go to their individual practitioners, at pulmonary clinics, etc. in order to be tested. And then these doctors would voluntarily inform the county so they could add the numbers to the scoreboard. OK, there’s Brush-off #1. THE ILLUSION OF TESTING – NO REAL MARKET My next question to the County was: what kind of testing are the doctors using at these clinics? Answer: we don’t know. See where this is going, as we start down the bureaucratic rabbit hole? So my next step was to call local MDs, especially pulmonary specialists in the Bay Area. After calling more than 50 of these offices, the answer was a resounding No – 100% of the time. No, we do not have any test that we can use to rule out coronavirus infection. Try it! Pretty safe to assume that 50 is a sufficient number of clinics in the Bay Area to determine whether there’s any clinic who offers PCR or any other test for coronavirus. My contention is that there are no practitioners who have such a test and therefore coronavirus screening tests are simply not available in Santa Clara County. And therefore we have no idea how many cases there are. Or if there are any at all. If you then ask the clinic – Do you know anyone who does have the test – guess what they say. Take a guess. They’ll tell you to call the Santa Clara County Dept. of Health – which is who told you to go to the individual clinics in the first place. There’s Brushoff #2. See the game here? Now why would all the pulmonary specialists in one of the most densely populated sections of the country have no interest whatsoever in screening people for a respiratory disease being hawked by all media as the most dangerous epidemic threat we’ve ever seen…? Obviously the respiratory MDs are not taking the outbreak very seriously – not much faith in its virulence. Think about it – if this epidemic were real, would all these doctors ignore an entire market, this huge? CONCLUSION AND HYPOTHESIS So a perfectly valid hypothesis might be this: the County’s online scoreboard is fraudulent. There are no proven cases at all. These reported cases of so-called COVID are nothing more than the flu, because there is no available testing procedure in all of the Bay Area that can diagnose the disease – in an area with 5 million people. And even if there were, the standard test cited in any medical reference for COVID is the RT-PCR test, for which we have seen above the evidence of its inherent inaccuracy and lack of reliability. By extrapolation then, it is fairly reasonable to say that the random reporting we see at work in one of the richest, most populous communities in the US is no different from what is going on everywhere else across the nation. Looks like it’s all being orchestrated via the same corporate narrative. What we’ve seen in the past few months may be nothing more than the standard re-categorization technique, traditionally used to conjure up new Boutique Epidemics, in the absence of any truly novel disease. [8] We have to look at last year’s figures. In every community, in very state, let’s take a look at the annual numbers of people who got the flu, for the past 3 years. Guess what you’ll find. No difference at all this year. ACID TEST - NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIER AND FALSE-POSITIVE
From Jason Hommel, My Summary of the COVID19 Hoax. Acid test of the SARS-CoV-2 test. We are told: – some people test positive but are asymptomatic carriers – some people test false-positive, ie, people test positive but are, in fact, not carrying the virus. Asymptomatic carriers are supposedly well people, who supposedly are infected and thus, “test positive”. There are also “false positives”, who are well people who are supposedly not infected, who “test positive”. There is no distinction, and no way to tell which is which, because both are well people who test positive. There is no second test to take to distinguish between “well”, “positive”, infected vs “well”, “positive”, not infected. 4. Numbers of cases and mortality Below is evidence showing how easy it is to falsely create a sense of pandemic by using a coronavirus: They're very common in any case and most people may be carrying a small amount of coronaviruses If you test only very sick people they are bound to have the virus but this doesn't mean that that's what making them sick or what kills them if they die. Italy admits fudging numbers by assigning deaths to people who also have serious health conditions. China's numbers were too predictable which doesn't happen with real data. Those who've recovered from the virus (the vast majority) are not being removed in updated statistics. CORONAVIRUS IDEAL FOR FUDGING THE NUMBERS
Commenter on Off-Guardian articles on COVID-19, VirusGuy, explains how easy it is to "create" a pandemic from a coronavirus. (While the moniker "VirusGuy" may undermine credibility to a degree I think we can accept that the poster may be concerned about his job and rather than judge by credentials look at what he says which tends to align with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg's words in link below.) Coronavirus are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world human population will have covi DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen. If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus. They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because covis are so common. There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time. All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease. Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die. You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR (Case Fatality Rate) higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on. Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist. Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically. Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people you are mislabelling – your case numbers, and especially your deaths, are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic. But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways. 1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead. 2. You can tell people that ‘minimising’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers. 3. You can talk bullshittery about r0 numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience. 4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptomless cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen Take these simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks. FORMER HEAD OF GERMAN HEALTH, DR WOLFGANG WODARG, SAYS VIRUS TESTING EXPOSES EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES SCAM
As chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg, co-signed a proposed resolution on December 18, 2009, which was briefly discussed in January 2010 in an emergency debate and called for an inquiry into alleged undue influence exerted by pharmaceutical companies on the World Health Organization’s global H1N1 flu campaign. In this video, Wodarg explains how testing of this alleged new virus has been conducted in an invalid manner and all are getting on board with the myth, just like The Emperor's New Clothes. ITALY'S AND CHINA'S NUMBERS FUDGED
NUMBER OF RECOVERED NOT BEING ELIMINATED
From chiropractor, Dr Tim O'Shea's March 2020 newsletter FOXLIVE 29 FEB Last Saturday, 29 Feb, President Trump, Mike Pence, Alex Azar, and Toni Fauci held a press conference, carried live on Fox. [5] If you didn’t watch that show, you’re not really interested in coronavirus. The first thing we learned is that at present there are only 22 cases of the “novel” virus in the entire United States. Let that fact sink in. Out of almost 350 million people. . ACKNOWLEDGING THE CURED That was the very first time a major news channel acknowledged that coronavirus wasn’t a very serious disease, because the majority of cases recovered completely in a couple of weeks. Just like the flu. And the cured should then be deducted from the statistics. No one else does that. Virtually every other story in all media for the past three months simply piles the cases up, week after week, continuing to add to a growing list, making no allowance for patients that are no longer sick. Which is 99.9% of them. This has been a brand new trick with this particular Boutique Epidemic – disregarding the cured. A tipoff to the underlying agenda. Result: it looks as though numbers are increasing out of control and it’s a growing global epidemic. This deliberately misleading tactic explains why reported numbers for coronavirus are all over the map, depending on the source. The whole tone of that Saturday’s Fox press conference was in stark contrast to everyday news reports on coronavirus, since it all began. Did you notice that? It was night and day. For once here were some very informed people – heads of HHS, NIH, the President – all saying the same thing – that Americans should go back to work and not worry about it, that the risk in this country was minimal, if that. Seriously, do you even know of one person with coronavirus? Their mood was the polar opposite of all other media stories. Across the board the four speakers were very measured, calm, and consistent with the facts. [5] They all agreed that even though there may be more cases appearing, for the most part it’s not a serious threat to public health. Mainly because it’s no more serious a disease than the flu, except in the cases of the debilitated. That was the very first time a major news channel acknowledged that coronavirus wasn’t a very serious disease, because the majority of cases recovered completely in a couple of weeks. Just like the flu. And the cured should then be deducted from the statistics. No one else does that. Virtually every other story in all media for the past three months simply piles the cases up, week after week, continuing to add to a growing list, making no allowance for patients that are no longer sick. Which is 99.9% of them. This has been a brand new trick with this particular Boutique Epidemic – disregarding the cured. A tipoff to the underlying agenda. Result: it looks as though numbers are increasing out of control and it’s a growing global epidemic. This deliberately misleading tactic explains why reported numbers for coronavirus are all over the map, depending on the source. The whole tone of that Saturday’s Fox press conference was in stark contrast to everyday news reports on coronavirus, since it all began. Did you notice that? It was night and day. For once here were some very informed people – heads of HHS, NIH, the President – all saying the same thing – that Americans should go back to work and not worry about it, that the risk in this country was minimal, if that. Seriously, do you even know of one person with coronavirus? Their mood was the polar opposite of all other media stories. Across the board the four speakers were very measured, calm, and consistent with the facts. [5] They all agreed that even though there may be more cases appearing, for the most part it’s not a serious threat to public health. Mainly because it’s no more serious a disease than the flu, except in the cases of the debilitated. Doctors given guidelines to "presume" COVID-19 as cause of death
Dr Scott Jensen, a practising MD and Minnesota senator, received a document from the the Vital Statistics Agency giving guidance on assigning deaths as "presumed" from COVID-19 without patient having been tested.
5. Confusing behaviour guidelines A list of confusing guidelines has been created by Dorset Eye (also see below) with regard to our behaviour. While the list is humorous it nevertheless raises questions about the reality of the event if it's possible for such contradiction in the guidelines. Surely, if we were really at risk the powers that be would have worked out more straightforward guidelines. Dorset Eye - the (un) official coronavirus guidelines
The (un) official Coronavirus guidelines 1. You MUST NOT leave the house for any reason, but if you have a reason, you can leave the house 2. Masks are useless at protecting you against the virus, but you may have to wear one because it can save lives, but they may not work, but they may be mandatory, but maybe not 3. Shops are closed, except those shops that are open 4. You must not go to work but you can get another job and go to work 5. You should not go to the Drs or to the hospital unless you have to go there, unless you are too poorly to go there 6. This virus can kill people, but don’t be scared of it. It can only kill those people who are vulnerable or those people who are not vulnerable people. It’s possible to contain and control it, sometimes, except that sometimes it actually leads to a global disaster 7. Gloves won’t help, but they can still help so wear them sometimes or not 8. STAY HOME, but it’s important to go out 9. There is no shortage of groceries in the supermarkets, but there are many things missing. Sometimes you won’t need loo rolls but you should buy some just in case you need some 10. The virus has no effect on children except those children it affects 11. Animals are not affected, but there is still a cat that tested positive in Belgium in February when no one had been tested, plus a few tigers here and there… 12. Stay 2 metres away from tigers (see point 11) 13. You will have many symptoms if your get the virus, but you can also get symptoms without getting the virus, get the virus without having any symptoms or be contagious without having symptoms, or be non contagious with symptoms… 14. To help protect yourself you should eat well and exercise, but eat whatever you have on hand as it’s better not to go out shopping 15. It’s important to get fresh air but don’t go to parks but go for a walk. But don’t sit down, except if you are old, but not for too long or if you are pregnant or if you’re not old or pregnant but need to sit down. If you do sit down don’t eat your picnic 16. Don’t visit old people but you have to take care of the old people and bring them food and medication 17. If you are sick, you can go out when you are better but anyone else in your household can’t go out when you are better unless they need to go out 18. You can get restaurant food delivered to the house. These deliveries are safe. But groceries you bring back to your house have to be decontaminated outside for 3 hours including Pizza… 19. You can’t see your older mother or grandmother, but they can take a taxi and meet an older taxi driver 20. You are safe if you maintain the safe social distance when out but you can’t go out with friends or strangers at the safe social distance 21. The virus remains active on different surfaces for two hours … or four hours… six hours… I mean days, not hours… But it needs a damp environment. Or a cold environment that is warm and dry… in the air, as long as the air is not plastic 22. Schools are closed so you need to home educate your children, unless you can send them to school because you’re not at home. If you are at home you can home educate your children using various portals and virtual class rooms, unless you have poor internet, or more than one child and only one computer, or you are working from home. Baking cakes can be considered maths, science or art. If you are home educating you can include household chores to be education. If you are home educating you can start drinking at 10am 23. If you are not home educating children you can also start drinking at 10am 24. The number of corona related deaths will be announced daily but we don’t know how many people are infected as they are only testing those who are almost dead to find out if that’s what they will die of… the people who die of corona who aren’t counted won’t be counted 25. You should stay in locked down until the virus stops infecting people but it will only stop infecting people if we all get infected so it’s important we get infected and some don’t get infected 26. You can join your neighbours for a street party and turn your music up for an outside disco and your neighbours won’t call the police. People in another street are allowed to call the police about your music 27. No business will go down due to Coronavirus except those businesses that will go down due to Coronavirus Hope this helps. 6. Sufferers: show no symptoms or behave unconvincingly / allege miraculous recoveries The sufferers below show no symptoms or behave unconvincingly or allege ludicrous miraculous recoveries. This sort of obviousness is expected in psychological operations. "Miracle survivors" are common in many events see Point 3 They tell us clearly. No indication of symptoms or behave unconvincingly / miracle survivors
No indication of symptoms or behaviour unconvincing — 40-year-old Ulster pastor not showing signs of symptoms — 41-year-old Italian not showing signs of symptoms — 39-year-old London patient, Tara Jane Langston, in ICU. 1. Completely against protocol that a COVID-19 patient would be in ICU coughing all over the place infecting other ICU patients. 2. If she's ill enough to be in ICU it seems very odd that she'd be well enough for an interview not to mention the fact that surely interviewing in ICU would also be completely against protocol. 3. Notice how when she coughs her head goes out of view (when she coughs away the cough sounds real but there's nothing to say it's not inserted audio). She shows us her wrist with what looks like taping of tubes and says, “They’ve had to sew that into my artery.” That makes no sense. She tells us she has a cannula, another cannula and a catheter. The nasal cannula makes sense but it's difficult to know what she'd need the other cannula and catheter for. Her laboured breathing is not particularly convincing. 4. In this article in the Guardian, Woman who filmed coronavirus warning receives online abuse, we are told: "And then the trauma was compounded by online trolls who flooded the family’s inbox with messages accusing them of a hoax." There are many, many instances of "hoax" being mentioned in the media one way or another - a typical feature of psyops. Trump told us too: "One of my people came up to me and said, “Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia.” That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax. That was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything. They tried it over and over. They’d been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning. They lost. It’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax." Fascinating analysis by "Inspector Norf" of Tara Jane Langston's past acting experience and her appearance as the patient in a video produced in a slick short film published 11 days after the video she had taken of herself in ICU went viral. Article in the Daily Mail about Tara Jane appearing in reality show, The Bridge. Note that some commenters who don't indicate they think COVID is a hoax show skepticism of Tara Jane's story. — Australian hire-car driver who drove home a passenger on the Ruby Princess and became infected, not showing signs of symptoms. We also wonder why the footage of her is such poor quality - devices don't take such poor quality footage these days. She said that her passenger had letters on her saying she was OK. You wonder why the driver didn't check the letters and if the passenger did have a letter how did she get this letter because we are told that the passengers were let off simply because they were considered low risk. We are not told elsewhere that they were all given letters. — 3 Americans, showing zero signs of symptoms Miracle survivors -- 82 year-old North Staffordshire grandfather makes miracle recovery - with antibiotics. How is this possible if antibiotics are said not to be a cure? — 90 year-old Washington grandmother makes miracle recovery from "death's door", potato soup being her secret weapon. No images of her suggest she is ill. A 52 year-old MIami man, "gaspin'", "on the brink of death" and thinking his "days were done" recovers miraculously with anti-malarial, chloroquine. Of course, the media is simply reporting what the alleged sufferers feel has helped them ... but surely for such a serious problem if potato soup and chloroquine have not been scientifically proven to help sufferers shouldn't the media be warning viewers? 7. Unconvincing husband of Ruby Princess passenger who allegedly died of COVID-19 Unconvincing loved one
Interview with Graeme Lake, Ruby Princess passenger. To celebrate her 75th birthday, Graeme went on a cruise with his wife, Karla, who allegedly died from COVID-19 after disembarking the ship. Anomalies: 1. The reporter says Karla started showing symptoms at Day 8 of the 13-day cruise while Graeme says he believed she picked up the virus on the 2rd or 3rd day before the trip ended. Graeme also mentions that they both had a dry cough but Karla’s kept getting worse and worse. He says, “I kept saying, ‘you’re coughing bad’. I didn’t take any notice.” Comment: Graeme’s estimation of when she picked up the bug doesn’t match with the reporter or with the sense of a cough going on for a few days on the boat. If he said he "kept saying, 'you're coughing bad'" how can he then say that he didn’t take any notice. Obviously, he noticed. Generally, when people say they kept repeating something to a person the obvious follow-on is it that the person they have been addressing didn't take any notice. 2. We are told Karla ended up in Caboolture hospital at which point Graeme says, “She was coughing but we talked and she said she’s fighting … and she was fighting.” This doesn’t really make sense. How was she fighting simply "coughing"? 3. We are told she went into ICU and 10 days later she was dead, however, we are given no sense of trajectory from dry cough to death. Why couldn't she have been saved in ICU? What symptoms led her to death? 4. He says, “This cruise has ruined us, ruined her completely.” Strange to say “us” and not to repeat it with “ruined” but to switch to “her” the second time. Also, to use the word ruin in relation to death. Death is beyond ruin. 5. He says, “It’s really devastated. Even now I’m still struggling.” It’s odd to use the word devastated in this context without following it with “me” or “us” (family) and how can he say “still struggling” when his wife has only just died. 8. Response Even if we disregard evidence that PCR is ineffective in testing for the virus and that the numbers are fudged, the response is vastly incommensurate. Response incommensurate regardless of virus reality
Even if we were able to isolate and show that COVID-19 existed, there is nothing in the epidemiology we are being presented with to justify any quarantine measures let alone the utterly insane measures we are seeing. Even if you don’t know anything about epidemiology can you not comprehend some basic statistics? We don’t quarantine flu with an r0 of about the same as this supposed novel covi and numbers of clinical cases hugely surpass it. We accept that more than half a million deaths will happen from flu but need to shield people from a few thousand covi deaths to the point of shutting down the whole of society. Why would this be the case? Are you less dead if the flu kills you? The hysteria and gullibility are breathtaking. And please do not tell me we need to act while the numbers are small, because that is our media talking through you and not your own thinking. Stop. Consider. Less than 1% of Wuhan’s population was clinically infected with this supposed novel covi. 3% of that 1% died. That is not the profile of a new killer pathogen. It is not the profile of anything you need extreme quarantine to beat. It is the profile of either a new weakly infective pathogen, or, as I strongly suspect, a known pathogen with good herd immunity. A flu virus in fact. 9. Pseudoscience There are ways to make information look as if it means things it doesn't. CRITIQUE OF ARTICLE, CORONAVIRUS: WHY YOU MUST ACT NOW, BY TOMAS PUEYO
Commenter on Off-Guardian articles on COVID-19, VirusGuy, in critiquing the article, Coronavirus: why you must act now, by Tomas Pueyo explains how it is easy to make things look significant which aren't. (While the moniker "VirusGuy" may undermine credibility to a degree I think we can accept that the poster may be concerned about his job and rather than judge by credentials look at what he says which tends to align with Dr Wolfgang Wodarg's words in link below.) That article is being widely promoted and is an attempt, in my view, to confuse ordinary people who are not scientists or epidemiologists into believing they are being given alarming new information when they are not. I believe it to be a well-crafted and cynical effort. If you break down the actual information provided therein it is basically a very long elucidation of the self-evident fact that in any viral cluster there will be newly emerging clinical and subclinical cases, particularly in the emergent phase, that are not yet incorporated into the stats. In other words there is a time lag between cases developing and being officially recognised. This is the situation with everything, every pathogen, every minor or major contagion cluster. Every cold outbreak, every viral gastroenteritis outbreak. It is absolutely and perfectly normal. As cases peak and begin to dwindle this lag also becomes less, until eventually new cases are negligible. This also is normal. I believe this article to be a sponsored disinformation effort, attempts to present this normal, regular aspect of epidemiology as if it were something unique and terrifying. You will note it never actually says so, but it implies it. It also uses language and numerous graphs to create a confusing impression of hard-to-assimilate information that is actually no more than noise. This is why I believe it to be disinformation, because this is a known methodology of blinding the public with pseudoscience. Like so: Take a commonly accepted common sense fact (e.g. that there is going to be a lag between sicknesses happening and being assimilated into stats), present it as if it were shocking and new and illustrate it with graphs that do nothing but serve to hide the basic and uncontested nature of the fact being hyped. Draw extreme conclusions or imply them. Above all, make your opening statement and closing statement frightening and much easier to assimilate than the word salad in between. People will read your first sentences, scroll through the bewildering graphs to the end, read your last sentence, be glad they can at least understand this and assume the rest of your study is too smart and science-based for them. They will of course accept your conclusions. This article we are discussing is an exemplar of this method. The simple fact of lag between clinical development and diagnosis turned into a bewildering forest of scary seeming stats and a completely unsupported conclusion. No one should give it time. It’s nonsense dressed up in ways known to have maximum psychological effects. As I say in my other lengthy post today I do not believe there is a novel coronavirus causing a pandemic. I believe it is a global scam with very concerning aims. I think the low numbes of cases reflect this. I think articles such as this one are intended to obscure these low numbers with chilling threats of future very high numbers. The aim is to make the threat seem so imminent it frightens people enough so they stop pointing out the real numbers don’t fit with the pandemic story. 10. In-your-face anomalies Snakes and pangolins
Two species of snake, Chinese cobra and many-banded krait, are wildlife reservoirs of virus? Chinese researchers, led by Wei Ji, a microbiologist at Peking University Health Science Center’s School of Basic Medical Sciences state, “the codons preferred by 2019-nCoV [are] those preferred by a handful of potential hosts that include: humans, bats, chickens, hedgehogs, pangolins, and two species of snakes”. When it is said about coronaviruses … "Coronaviruses are a group of viruses that cause diseases in mammals and birds. In humans, the viruses cause respiratory infections which are typically mild including the common cold but rarer forms like SARS and MERS can be lethal. In cows and pigs they may cause diarrhea, while in chickens they can cause an upper respiratory disease. There are no vaccines or antiviral drugs that are approved for prevention or treatment" ...
Chinese snake theory peer-reviewed and published in journal. Said of by Australian zoologist "It's complete garbage." We are told in the research article Wei Ji and his team published in the Journal of Medical Virology: Results obtained from our analyses suggest that the 2019‐nCoV appears to be a recombinant virus between the bat coronavirus and an origin‐unknown coronavirus. The recombination occurred within the viral spike glycoprotein, which recognizes cell surface receptor. Additionally, our findings suggest that snake is the most probable wildlife animal reservoir for the 2019‐nCoV based on its RSCU bias resembling snake compared to other animals. But in response to this paper: “It’s complete garbage,” says Edward Holmes, a zoologist at the University of Sydney’s Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, who specializes in emerging RNA viruses, a class that includes coronaviruses like 2019-nCoV.
Critically-endangered pangolins on sale and civet cat shown (alleged SARS carrier) Can it be true that critically endangered pangolins are on sale at Wuhan market and why do they show us a civet cat (the alleged source of SARS) in the photo when the caption refers to pangolins? Hospitals in record time
Story 2: Building of a hospital from scratch - I've seen media reports for 4 days, 6 days, 9 days and 10 days!
China is building special coronavirus hospital to treat 1,000 in just SIX DAYS -The Mirror, 26 January, 2020 Amazingly, according to the time-lapse video below, it seems the hospital was, in fact, built in a very short period but however short the period was a great deal of time in planning and pre-fabrication would have had to occur. This hospital was planned, it wasn't built in response to the sudden coronavirus pandemic. And the hospital will most certainly not be just equipped to handle coronavirus cases whatever the number of cases is. Contradictory and implausible stories about hospitals being set up
We are presented with two contradictory and equally implausible stories about a "coronavirus" hospital being set up Story 1: Conversion of empty building to hospital China opens 1,000-bed coronavirus hospital after just 48 hours of construction - Metro - 29 January 2020 The Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Centre started receiving patients at 10.30pm last night after workers spent just 48 hours converting an empty building. In my opinion, the "empty buildings" below look like drawings and certainly give no sense of having been converted into a hospital. 
Story 2: Building of a hospital from scratch - I've seen media reports for 4 days, 6 days, 9 days and 10 days!
China is building special coronavirus hospital to treat 1,000 in just SIX DAYS -The Mirror, 26 January, 2020 Amazingly, according to the time-lapse video below, it seems the hospital was, in fact, built in a very short period but however short the period was a great deal of time in planning and pre-fabrication would have had to occur. This hospital was planned, it wasn't built in response to the sudden coronavirus pandemic. And the hospital will most certainly not be just equipped to handle coronavirus cases whatever the number of cases is. Strange patients
People: lying on floor, falling flat on face, dead on street Do you find this person laid out on the floor and another falling flat on their face convincing as sufferers? And what about the man stretched out in the video shown within the article, Coronavirus: Man found dead in street in face mask in shocking image in the Independent, Anomalies in interview with asymptomatic cruise ship passenger There are a number of anomalies to be found in this 10-minute interview conducted by a CBC news anchor with Rebecca Frasure, a Diamond Princess passenger.
11. Recognised hoax within alleged real event A common feature of hoaxes is to fabricate a "recognised" hoax within the larger unrecognised hoax. And there is absolutely no shortage of "hoaxes" within a hoax in the case of this alleged pandemic. And there is, of course, Donald Trump's infamous mention in relation to the Democrats. Do an internet search and you will be greeted by thousands of responses - all the better to hide information calling out the pandemic as a hoax, no? In the article below, we're told that a passenger declaring he had the coronavirus caused the pilot to return to Toronto (2 hours into a 4 hour flight to Montego Bay), however, once arrived back in Toronto the passenger was declared not to be suffering from the virus. One wonders on what basis it was decided there was sufficient cause for concern to turn the flight around. Flight records show that WestJet flight 2702 did indeed return to Toronto, however, this doesn't mean that the return wasn't planned and staged as part of the "live exercise". Perhaps it serves as advertising for WestJet, promoting the message they take the utmost care. Woman frustrated as coronavirus hoax forces plane to turn around - Bradford Today (Canadian local press), 5 February 2020 12. Is the Coronavirus scare just one on a continuum?
Evidence of staging for both Ebola and Corona. (5 min) Video on Coronavirus Zika Ebola Anthrax (33 min) 13. Guinea-pigs for never-before used vaccination Are we all going to be guinea pigs for a never-before used vaccination? (see also fake swine flu news) 14. Other commentary.
15. So what is this alleged pandemic? The evidence clearly shows it is not a pandemic and there is no special virus. This event, like a number of others including 9/11, is a massive Trauma-based Mind Control Psychological Operation in the form of a "live pandemic exercise". Its purpose is to instil fear into the global population in order to make us compliant and to fool us into believing that the inevitable financial crash is all due to this virus, while robbing us, removing our employment and destroying our lives. We can also see it as a Problem > Reaction > Solution scenario. 1. Invent a problem - Terrorism, financial crisis, etc. 2. Fabricate a response that isn't commensurate (even if the problem were real) but people will still go along with - Let the mainstream media only broadcast/print the side of the problem you want to show 3. Enforce a solution that also doesn't make sense (even if the problem were real) but people will still comply with - wars, corporate tax-cuts, welfare budget cuts, etc. Problem > Reaction > Solution scenarios date from at least the Roman emperor, Diocletian. "Diocletian’s vice-emperor, Galerius, didn’t have a hard time in persuading him that if a Palace were just to burn down, Diocletian could really accelerate his crusade against the Christians. Just by coincidence, twice within sixteen days toward the end of February, Diocletian’s palace in Nicomedia burned. The Christians were immediately blamed."
382 Comments
|
AuthorAnalyse the fakery the power elite is drowning us in. Archives
August 2020
Categories |
RSS Feed