Below is evidence that the crash of MH-17 in eastern Ukraine was staged.
(Also see Did PS-752 crash in Tehran? and Did Asiana Flight 24 crash in San Francisco?)
1. Absence of clear evidence of reality
A major point to consider is that there is no clear evidence of reality of the crash
2. Bodies, body parts and debris
The image on the left below shows dead bodies, body parts and debris in the background which show signs of fakery while the image on the right is a Spencer Tunick photograph of naked bodies for comparison.
Original source of image, NRT24, no longer exists - new source although image slightly different Sputnik Images.
Link to other crash photos.
Below are zoomed-in parts of the photo with comments:
3. Anomalies in cockpit images
The damage shown in the images below of the plane cockpit area do not match:
Image 1 from India Today
Image 2 from Tass
1: Dirty marks around cockpit windows / 2: No dirty marks
1: Vertical hole under first window straight and does not extend / 2: Curved hole.that extends more thickly
1. Small hole under right vertical frame of second window / 2. Much more extended hole and the start of the hole a different shape
1. Little crinkling at red and blue stripes / 2. Great deal of crinkling at red and blue stripes
You also have to wonder how the cockpit was severed from the rest of the plane. The edge looks cut.
4. Cube and bow-tie shaped projectiles?
In the first video at this ABC News article (at 2:51), they tell us:
The aeroplane was perforated by hundreds of high-energy objects shaped like cubes and bow-ties.
Really, cubes and bow-ties? Wouldn’t the physics be against such military projectiles? And what would be the purpose of the two different types? Additionally, the holes in the cockpits give no indication they were made by such projectiles.
5. Raining bodies?
Text accompanying a video published one year on by the Daily Mail
'It's raining bodies': Harrowing new video captures the moment traumatised couple watch MH17 victims fall from the sky as they drive past burning wreckage in Ukraine
The video only shows some burning in the distance without any evidence of what the people in the video refer to. Why would they say, "It's raining bodies," when there is no footage of a plane actually crashing and while the Daily Mail reports that that is what is said these words are not presented in the subtitles.
6. The Maslins, allegedly the parents of three young children who died, are completely unconvincing
Grief is not convincingly displayed. Of course, people can be experiencing grief without obviously displaying it and the alleged crash happened 5 years before this interview, however, you could never argue that the demeanour of the Maslins favours real grief over none.
The father says: "I don't feel anger towards the people who fired the rocket - I feel much something much worse - I feel pity." Question: How is pity worse than anger?
We are told that since the loss of their three young children they had a fourth child. The father says:
"We choose to think and act positively whenever we can. The best example of that is focusing on what you have not on what you've lost."
I don't find this sort of homily credible from someone who's lost three young children.