Did MH-17 crash in eastern Ukraine?

Below is evidence that the crash of MH-17 in eastern Ukraine was staged.
(Also see Did PS-752 crash in Tehran? and Did Asiana Flight 24 crash in San Francisco?)

1. Absence of clear evidence of reality
A major point to consider is that there is no clear evidence of reality of the crash

2. Bodies, body parts and debris
The image on the left below shows dead bodies, body parts and debris in the background which show signs of fakery while the image on the right is a Spencer Tunick photograph of naked bodies for comparison.
Original source of image, NRT24, no longer exists - new source although image slightly different Sputnik Images.
Link to other crash photos.

General:

• Zero aspects of the bodies and aircraft debris favouring real over faked
• Absence of any visuals of blood, severance edge or other indicators of violence (these are not essential but obviously their absence does not help in making the image compellingly real)
• The flesh tone is perfectly even which doesn’t match reality and doesn’t really look the colour of flesh
• The extremely shredded debris is difficult to relate to an airliner and if it did come from an airliner, the degree of shredding seems both unusual and difficult to match to the relative intactness of the much softer bodies. 

Below are zoomed-in parts of the photo with comments:

• The buttock on the right is not flesh-coloured but nor does it look bloody
• It’s difficult to explain the colour of the thigh – it doesn’t look convincingly like bruising
• The head is very undefined or it it's not the head but some item that's slightly head-looking then we wonder where the head might be.

• Arms lack definition and do not clearly resemble arms.

• The "pink hair head" is very poorly defined if it is a head and if it's not then we wonder where the head might be and why there is no sense of severance.
• Bottom half poorly defined and right and left shoulders don’t look at right angle and distance.

• The lower legs are very undefined
  
• Why would the person have their trousers pulled up

• The thigh, lower leg and foot of the on-top leg don’t look as if they’re sitting at quite the right angle to each other.
• No sense of severance, more a sense of a bottom-half of body dummy

• It is very hard to determine what this debris would relate to in terms of an aeroplane. But if it were genuine shredded airliner debris, you would wonder why the softer bodies weren't more mangled relative to the harder plane debris.

3. Anomalies in cockpit images
The damage shown in the images below of the plane cockpit area do not match:
Image 1 from India Today
Image 2 from Tass

​1: Dirty marks around cockpit windows / 2: No dirty marks
1: Vertical hole under first window straight and does not extend / 2: Curved hole.that extends more thickly
1. Small hole under right vertical frame of second window / 2. Much more extended hole and the start of the hole a different shape
1. Little crinkling at red and blue stripes / 2. Great deal of crinkling at red and blue stripes

You also have to wonder how the cockpit was severed from the rest of the plane. The edge looks cut.

4. Cube and bow-tie shaped projectiles?
In the first video at this ABC News article (at 2:51), they tell us:

The aeroplane was perforated by hundreds of high-energy objects shaped like cubes and bow-ties.

Really, cubes and bow-ties? Wouldn’t the physics be against such military projectiles? And what would be the purpose of the two different types? Additionally, the holes in the cockpits give no indication they were made by such projectiles.

5. Raining bodies?
Text accompanying a video published one year on by the Daily Mail

'It's raining bodies': Harrowing new video captures the moment traumatised couple watch MH17 victims fall from the sky as they drive past burning wreckage in Ukraine
--- Shocking video captured on mobile phone as couple drove past field
--- Man shouts: 'F***! So many people! Someone's leg, did you see that?'
--- Woman so disturbed she says she can't stay and insists on driving away
​
Harrowing new footage of the moment parts of MH17 crashed into a Ukrainian field has emerged one year on from the tragedy.

The shaky mobile video entitled 'It's raining bodies' has been released on the internet and was shot by a traumatised couple as they drove past the scene where the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 was shot down, killing all 298 people on board.
​
The woman is so disturbed by seeing people falling from the blitzed plane amid the burning wreckage that she cannot stay and insists on driving away.

Comment:
​The video only shows some burning in the distance without any evidence of what the people in the video refer to. Why would they say, "It's raining bodies," when there is no footage of a plane actually crashing and while the Daily Mail reports that that is what is said these words are not presented in the subtitles.

6. The Maslins, allegedly the parents of three young children who died, are completely unconvincing

Grief is not convincingly displayed. Of course, people can be experiencing grief without obviously displaying it and the alleged crash happened 5 years before this interview, however, you could never argue that the demeanour of the Maslins favours real grief over none.

The father says: "I don't feel anger towards the people who fired the rocket - I feel much something much worse - I feel pity." Question: How is pity worse than anger?

​We are told that since the loss of their three young children they had a fourth child. The father says:
"We choose to think and act positively whenever we can. The best example of that is focusing on what you have not on what you've lost."
I don't find this sort of homily credible from someone who's lost three young children.