9/11 - September 11, 2001
Half-truths make great lies.
Anonymous
A half-truth is even more dangerous than a lie. A lie, you can detect at some stage, but half a truth is sure to mislead you for long.
Anurag Shourie, Half A Shadow
All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X
The official story required either that one descended into total intellectual senility in order to still believe it – perhaps deliberately made ridiculous for that very purpose – or else that one keep one's intellect alive but destroy almost everything that one had previously believed about how society works.
Gerard Holmgren
The techniques used in Psychological Operations (psyops) are sophisticated and involve targeting both those who believe what is told to them by media and government without question ... but most importantly also those who do question in order to mislead the questioners. The perpetrators are very skilled in getting the questioners to only get half the story correct and thus hamstring them in their efforts to determine the truth and promulgate it. It is essential to get the whole truth, not a half-truth/half-lie situation as that leads nowhere. If you are a questioner it is very important to keep in mind that in psyops what is actually wanted is done for real while what is not wanted is faked. This fact cannot be overemphasised - of course, if something needs to be done for real even if not wanted it would be done but one must consider carefully when it would need to be done for real. Is there ever that requirement? If propaganda techniques can be used to persuade people of SOME aspects of a psyop is there any reason that they cannot be used for ALL aspects?
Anonymous
A half-truth is even more dangerous than a lie. A lie, you can detect at some stage, but half a truth is sure to mislead you for long.
Anurag Shourie, Half A Shadow
All this was inspired by the principle—which is quite true within itself—that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods.
It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.
Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X
The official story required either that one descended into total intellectual senility in order to still believe it – perhaps deliberately made ridiculous for that very purpose – or else that one keep one's intellect alive but destroy almost everything that one had previously believed about how society works.
Gerard Holmgren
The techniques used in Psychological Operations (psyops) are sophisticated and involve targeting both those who believe what is told to them by media and government without question ... but most importantly also those who do question in order to mislead the questioners. The perpetrators are very skilled in getting the questioners to only get half the story correct and thus hamstring them in their efforts to determine the truth and promulgate it. It is essential to get the whole truth, not a half-truth/half-lie situation as that leads nowhere. If you are a questioner it is very important to keep in mind that in psyops what is actually wanted is done for real while what is not wanted is faked. This fact cannot be overemphasised - of course, if something needs to be done for real even if not wanted it would be done but one must consider carefully when it would need to be done for real. Is there ever that requirement? If propaganda techniques can be used to persuade people of SOME aspects of a psyop is there any reason that they cannot be used for ALL aspects?
One-hour film, 9/11 Fraud and Terror Agenda, from Earthly Fireflies that does an excellent job covering what is covered on my 9/11 pages ... and more.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Almost immediately upon hearing of the 9/11 plane crashes, I wondered why no interceptor had been sent for the second plane - knowing nothing about air defence I didn't wonder about this lack for the first plane because I thought that maybe the first one could slip through but I reasoned that once the first plane had struck surely they could have got the second - for some reason I didn't question the lack for the third and fourth planes. Of course, it is completely alien to protocol that any of the planes not be intercepted and to this day, no explanation has ever been given for this beyond-implausible failure (see Point 6 - Four faked plane crashes). I didn't question beyond that initial puzzlement because it struck me as simply impossible that the perps would have the confidence to know that they could conduct such an operation and get away with it though I thought they'd be capable of just about anything if they thought they could get away with it. But I knew absolutely zero about how the power elite operates. Of course, they knew they could get away with it with their intimidatory power, their vast experience of duping us with their clever mind-control techniques; their always numerous willing (and less willing) collaborators; those who simply stay silent ... and last, but certainly not least, their semi-collaborators, the gatekeepers - those who are the recognised critics of the powers that be but who still, after 18 years now, have resisted all attempts made by 9/11 truthers to apprise them of the fact, easily obtained from rudimentary scholarship, that the three buildings at the World Trade Centre came down by controlled demolition, especially in the case of WTC-7, whose classic implosion was presented to us on a platter. It was only in 2014, 13 years after the event that I began to wake up when I saw the film JFK to 9/11: Everything is a Rich Man's Trick.
9/11 was a Trauma-based Mind Control Psychological Operation or psyop, a monumentally multi-layered exercise of dupery, where the only major parts of the official story that happened for real on the day were the collapses of the three buildings at the World Trade Centre and damage to the other WTC buildings and the West Wing of the Pentagon. There were no hijackings and the four plane crashes were faked as were the deaths of 3,000 people and injury to 6,000. The psyop took the form, essentially, of a Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising multiple drills; controlled demolition of the buildings at the WTC and damage to the other WTC buildings and the West Wing of the Pentagon and a carefully orchestrated media roll-out of the day's events that included pre-recorded staged and faked footage. They tell us openly in Wikipedia about a few exercises that were conducted on (and through) 9/11 while Webster Tarpley lists 46 drills although there is no clear match between the Wikipedia exercises and the Tarpley drills. Judging by Tarpley's list there should be more exercises. The drills they don't reveal, however, are the ones producing the images of faked injuries and deaths (many of which would have occurred prior to 9/11 and for which we see the images (many photoshopped onto backgrounds) ... or if they do list the drills (and I wouldn't be at all surprised if the drills are listed right in front of our eyes), it's not clear that's what they are. Using the propaganda technique of distraction, they focused truthers on the suspiciously large number of drills to suppress thought on the crucial few they omitted to tell us about. The multiple exercises (including anti-hijacking exercises) were used as justification for defense protocols not working properly because of resulting confusion, but, of course, when they run exercises they ensure that if a real event should oh-so-coincidentally happen at the same time, they would be able to deal with it (after all, who knows who might know about the exercises) and the seeming failure is so utterly abject that "confusion" fails miserably as a justification. The alleged FAA incompetence excuse fails equally miserably.
Wikipedia informs us there is supposed confusion about an ongoing NORAD exercise called Vigilant Warrior (as opposed to the semi-annual Vigilant Guardian). Perhaps no confusion at all and there was indeed an exercise, Vigilant Warrior, that covered drills specific to the 9/11 event while the other exercises acted as a bogus excuse for allegedly causing confusion and diverting resources necessary to deal with the alleged attacks. This article by Elizabeth Woodworth, The Military Drills of September 11th: Why a New Investigation is Needed, points out numerous anomalies in what is told to us about the military drills.
When you recognise that death and injury were faked, the picture of 9/11 changes enormously. Then it becomes obvious that a number of reporters and agency staff were scripted and that they knew the truth: that 9/11 was, essentially, a Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise pushed out as a real event, like so many other events. Some reporters and agency staff would not be in on it (though surely they would have their suspicions) but you can tell that some are obviously scripted and are really actors in the exercise. We can infer that because the perpetrators didn't kill or injure people they're actually quite free with the truth in the way that they give us so many signs that they were responsible. When I first awoke to the key lie about death and injury, Cheney and Rumsfeld's smug and smiling faces came to mind - I can just see them all having such a chortle. (Admittedly, even though they really did kill JFK they still brazenly indicated that they were the perpetrators in Lee Harvey Oswald's choice of weapon for his crackshot assassination: a relic of Mussolini's armed forces used in WWII, a Carcano that wasn't even sighted in (compare 9/11 boxcutters). They flaunt their power by rubbing their crimes in our faces and challenging us to do anything about it.)
Below are three examples where we see scripting.
--- The first exchange is propaganda to persuade us that 200-ton airliners were able to bring down 500.000 ton buildings ... with an oblique reference to the truth.
--- The second one, on the other hand, is more truth than propaganda. We can only infer that it is a legal requirement of staged events that indications be provided that it is they who are responsible for the event and one of the ways is actually telling the truth. They very clearly tell us the truth by saying it "went in" and that they "knew it was comin' all day" with a little propaganda thrown in - it might "come down on its own" (no possibility of that). With regard to the "building was unstable" this may well have been a true statement as there could have been work done to weaken the building early on 9/11 when the twin towers were capturing all the attention or even before 9/11..
--- The third one - unadulterated truth, no?, at least, when you know it's scripted.
To support my claim that 9/11 was a psychological operation (and not a semi-psyop in that they let people die and be injured or the work of 19 terrorists armed with boxcutters) I provide the following three 10-point Occam's Razor exercises (and offer an Occam's Razor challenge to those who support the official stories of these aspects of 9/11 to provide their own 10 points):Other 9/11 pages:
The key to keeping the truth of 9/11 from emerging is the perpetuation of one major lie of the story: that 3,000 people were killed and 6,000 were injured. We can tell from the propaganda model that the perps put considerable, planned effort into ensuring that everyone continues believing - recognisers of the other major 9/11 lies and believers of the 19-terrorists-armed-with-boxcutters story alike - that 3,000 people died on 9/11. Let's take a look at the propaganda aimed at the truthers designed to ensure continuance of their belief in real death and injury on 9/11.
The propaganda model - targeting the truthers
The propaganda model for 9/11 is a very interesting one. It seems fiendishly clever (it had me fooled for four years) but, on analysis, it is really quite straightforward.
Rogue elements within the state who commit a crime against democracy of a false-flag nature will put a great deal of thought into how they will keep the citizens persuaded that the story they tell matches the event they have staged. For probably millennia, the information about how to do this has been passed on by those in the power elite from one generation to the next. They understand how people split into groups in how they respond to their Trauma-based Mind Control Psychological Operations (psyops) on Day One and then how these different groups’ understandings will change (or not) over time.
The secret to the persistence of the lies of 9/11 is not that the evidence is beyond our reach. Not at all. The evidence is very clearly “hidden in plain sight” in the videos of the collapses of the buildings and the obviously computer-generated plane crash into the second tower.
The secret is in the very clever propaganda model. The perpetrators knew that the truth of how the buildings collapsed at the World Trade Centre and the alleged plane crashes is easily determined through basic Newtonian physics and they knew that a certain percentage of the population would recognise these truths - we really do have to wonder why they offered us the perfect implosion of WTC-7 on a platter. So what they have done to stymie the group who recognises these truths from promulgating them is to create propaganda specifically aimed at this group to ensure its members believe, as do the majority who believe the whole 19-terrorists-armed-with-boxcutters story, that tragically 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured on 9/11. "Inside conspiracy" and "real death and injury" are simply two pieces of the 9/11 puzzle that won't fit together - they repel each other like magnets. And while it is only those two pieces (one piece being truth but the other a lie) floating around, the truth remains hidden. It cannot emerge. It's not that the perps are not evil enough - they send their soldiers off to self-generated wars from which they make a ton of money - but it wouldn't be their modus operandi. They pride themselves on their ability to fool us and have a great old chortle over it too.
They had no motive to kill all those people and they had a compelling disincentive - the loved ones of the 3,000 dead and 6,000 injured. A very, very compelling disincentive. The most important thing for the perps in this sort of operation is to control the information. Control of information is paramount whether it be truth, lie, distorted-truth, whatever, they want to control it - as long as they're in control of the information, they're happy. Having the loved ones of 3,000 dead and 6,000 injured people, not to mention the 6,000 injured themselves, descending on the Capitol when controlled demolition is so obvious, does not represent in any shape or form a "controlled information situation". But in any case, 9/11 was a psyop. They don't do their psyops half-arsed. They do them according to the rules and they need only their masterful propaganda techniques, their intimidatory power and their numerous collaborators. Nothing more. Only the things needed and wanted for real are done for real and everything else is faked. Real death and injury were not needed nor wanted in the least.
Truth mixed with lies
Their method was ingenious. They transformed a truth liability into a magical propaganda asset! Among other propaganda techniques, they created “disinformation agents” who indicate, in one way or another, that they know or suspect the buildings came down by controlled demolition or in other ways suspect government involvement while at the same time tell a story of a loved one or associates perishing in the buildings. It is such a clever mix of truth (or a distorted version of it) with the one fundamental lie that the power elite must have everyone believe: many people tragically died and were injured. Truth mixed with lies. I’m not sure there is a better way to misdirect people and push a lie than to mix it with truth.
The groups anticipated by the perpetrators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Almost immediately upon hearing of the 9/11 plane crashes, I wondered why no interceptor had been sent for the second plane - knowing nothing about air defence I didn't wonder about this lack for the first plane because I thought that maybe the first one could slip through but I reasoned that once the first plane had struck surely they could have got the second - for some reason I didn't question the lack for the third and fourth planes. Of course, it is completely alien to protocol that any of the planes not be intercepted and to this day, no explanation has ever been given for this beyond-implausible failure (see Point 6 - Four faked plane crashes). I didn't question beyond that initial puzzlement because it struck me as simply impossible that the perps would have the confidence to know that they could conduct such an operation and get away with it though I thought they'd be capable of just about anything if they thought they could get away with it. But I knew absolutely zero about how the power elite operates. Of course, they knew they could get away with it with their intimidatory power, their vast experience of duping us with their clever mind-control techniques; their always numerous willing (and less willing) collaborators; those who simply stay silent ... and last, but certainly not least, their semi-collaborators, the gatekeepers - those who are the recognised critics of the powers that be but who still, after 18 years now, have resisted all attempts made by 9/11 truthers to apprise them of the fact, easily obtained from rudimentary scholarship, that the three buildings at the World Trade Centre came down by controlled demolition, especially in the case of WTC-7, whose classic implosion was presented to us on a platter. It was only in 2014, 13 years after the event that I began to wake up when I saw the film JFK to 9/11: Everything is a Rich Man's Trick.
9/11 was a Trauma-based Mind Control Psychological Operation or psyop, a monumentally multi-layered exercise of dupery, where the only major parts of the official story that happened for real on the day were the collapses of the three buildings at the World Trade Centre and damage to the other WTC buildings and the West Wing of the Pentagon. There were no hijackings and the four plane crashes were faked as were the deaths of 3,000 people and injury to 6,000. The psyop took the form, essentially, of a Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising multiple drills; controlled demolition of the buildings at the WTC and damage to the other WTC buildings and the West Wing of the Pentagon and a carefully orchestrated media roll-out of the day's events that included pre-recorded staged and faked footage. They tell us openly in Wikipedia about a few exercises that were conducted on (and through) 9/11 while Webster Tarpley lists 46 drills although there is no clear match between the Wikipedia exercises and the Tarpley drills. Judging by Tarpley's list there should be more exercises. The drills they don't reveal, however, are the ones producing the images of faked injuries and deaths (many of which would have occurred prior to 9/11 and for which we see the images (many photoshopped onto backgrounds) ... or if they do list the drills (and I wouldn't be at all surprised if the drills are listed right in front of our eyes), it's not clear that's what they are. Using the propaganda technique of distraction, they focused truthers on the suspiciously large number of drills to suppress thought on the crucial few they omitted to tell us about. The multiple exercises (including anti-hijacking exercises) were used as justification for defense protocols not working properly because of resulting confusion, but, of course, when they run exercises they ensure that if a real event should oh-so-coincidentally happen at the same time, they would be able to deal with it (after all, who knows who might know about the exercises) and the seeming failure is so utterly abject that "confusion" fails miserably as a justification. The alleged FAA incompetence excuse fails equally miserably.
Wikipedia informs us there is supposed confusion about an ongoing NORAD exercise called Vigilant Warrior (as opposed to the semi-annual Vigilant Guardian). Perhaps no confusion at all and there was indeed an exercise, Vigilant Warrior, that covered drills specific to the 9/11 event while the other exercises acted as a bogus excuse for allegedly causing confusion and diverting resources necessary to deal with the alleged attacks. This article by Elizabeth Woodworth, The Military Drills of September 11th: Why a New Investigation is Needed, points out numerous anomalies in what is told to us about the military drills.
When you recognise that death and injury were faked, the picture of 9/11 changes enormously. Then it becomes obvious that a number of reporters and agency staff were scripted and that they knew the truth: that 9/11 was, essentially, a Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise pushed out as a real event, like so many other events. Some reporters and agency staff would not be in on it (though surely they would have their suspicions) but you can tell that some are obviously scripted and are really actors in the exercise. We can infer that because the perpetrators didn't kill or injure people they're actually quite free with the truth in the way that they give us so many signs that they were responsible. When I first awoke to the key lie about death and injury, Cheney and Rumsfeld's smug and smiling faces came to mind - I can just see them all having such a chortle. (Admittedly, even though they really did kill JFK they still brazenly indicated that they were the perpetrators in Lee Harvey Oswald's choice of weapon for his crackshot assassination: a relic of Mussolini's armed forces used in WWII, a Carcano that wasn't even sighted in (compare 9/11 boxcutters). They flaunt their power by rubbing their crimes in our faces and challenging us to do anything about it.)
Below are three examples where we see scripting.
- Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor asks Jerome Hauer, WTC Security Contractor about the cause of collapse of the twin towers:
"Is it possible that just a plane crash could have collapsed these buildings? Or would it have required the prior positioning of other explosives in the building? What do you think?"
"No my sense is just the velocity of the plane and the fact that you have a plane filled with fuel hitting that building and I think it was simply the planes hitting the buildings and causing the collapse." - Conversation between Brian Williams, MSNBC News Anchor and David Restuccio, FDNY EMS Lieutenant about WTC-7, the third building to collapse at the WTC on 9/11, after its collapse:
"Can you confirm that it was No 7 that just went in?" ["Went in" is a term used in controlled demolition that comes from the fact that the buildings fall in on themselves.]
"Yes, sir."
"And you guys knew this was comin' all day."
"We had heard reports that the building was unstable and that eventually it would either come down on its own or it would be taken down." - Dan Rather reporting on the collapse of WTC-7:
"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much of on television, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down."
--- The first exchange is propaganda to persuade us that 200-ton airliners were able to bring down 500.000 ton buildings ... with an oblique reference to the truth.
--- The second one, on the other hand, is more truth than propaganda. We can only infer that it is a legal requirement of staged events that indications be provided that it is they who are responsible for the event and one of the ways is actually telling the truth. They very clearly tell us the truth by saying it "went in" and that they "knew it was comin' all day" with a little propaganda thrown in - it might "come down on its own" (no possibility of that). With regard to the "building was unstable" this may well have been a true statement as there could have been work done to weaken the building early on 9/11 when the twin towers were capturing all the attention or even before 9/11..
--- The third one - unadulterated truth, no?, at least, when you know it's scripted.
To support my claim that 9/11 was a psychological operation (and not a semi-psyop in that they let people die and be injured or the work of 19 terrorists armed with boxcutters) I provide the following three 10-point Occam's Razor exercises (and offer an Occam's Razor challenge to those who support the official stories of these aspects of 9/11 to provide their own 10 points):Other 9/11 pages:
- Gerard Holmgren, pioneering 9/11 researcher
- Twin Towers: The Magic Dust
- Why collapse WTC-7 by perfect implosion on 9/11 ... when they didn't have to?
- Blog post: 9/11: False flag or psyop?
- Blog post: 9/11: Controlled demolition as propaganda - Parts 1 and 2
The key to keeping the truth of 9/11 from emerging is the perpetuation of one major lie of the story: that 3,000 people were killed and 6,000 were injured. We can tell from the propaganda model that the perps put considerable, planned effort into ensuring that everyone continues believing - recognisers of the other major 9/11 lies and believers of the 19-terrorists-armed-with-boxcutters story alike - that 3,000 people died on 9/11. Let's take a look at the propaganda aimed at the truthers designed to ensure continuance of their belief in real death and injury on 9/11.
The propaganda model - targeting the truthers
The propaganda model for 9/11 is a very interesting one. It seems fiendishly clever (it had me fooled for four years) but, on analysis, it is really quite straightforward.
Rogue elements within the state who commit a crime against democracy of a false-flag nature will put a great deal of thought into how they will keep the citizens persuaded that the story they tell matches the event they have staged. For probably millennia, the information about how to do this has been passed on by those in the power elite from one generation to the next. They understand how people split into groups in how they respond to their Trauma-based Mind Control Psychological Operations (psyops) on Day One and then how these different groups’ understandings will change (or not) over time.
The secret to the persistence of the lies of 9/11 is not that the evidence is beyond our reach. Not at all. The evidence is very clearly “hidden in plain sight” in the videos of the collapses of the buildings and the obviously computer-generated plane crash into the second tower.
The secret is in the very clever propaganda model. The perpetrators knew that the truth of how the buildings collapsed at the World Trade Centre and the alleged plane crashes is easily determined through basic Newtonian physics and they knew that a certain percentage of the population would recognise these truths - we really do have to wonder why they offered us the perfect implosion of WTC-7 on a platter. So what they have done to stymie the group who recognises these truths from promulgating them is to create propaganda specifically aimed at this group to ensure its members believe, as do the majority who believe the whole 19-terrorists-armed-with-boxcutters story, that tragically 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured on 9/11. "Inside conspiracy" and "real death and injury" are simply two pieces of the 9/11 puzzle that won't fit together - they repel each other like magnets. And while it is only those two pieces (one piece being truth but the other a lie) floating around, the truth remains hidden. It cannot emerge. It's not that the perps are not evil enough - they send their soldiers off to self-generated wars from which they make a ton of money - but it wouldn't be their modus operandi. They pride themselves on their ability to fool us and have a great old chortle over it too.
They had no motive to kill all those people and they had a compelling disincentive - the loved ones of the 3,000 dead and 6,000 injured. A very, very compelling disincentive. The most important thing for the perps in this sort of operation is to control the information. Control of information is paramount whether it be truth, lie, distorted-truth, whatever, they want to control it - as long as they're in control of the information, they're happy. Having the loved ones of 3,000 dead and 6,000 injured people, not to mention the 6,000 injured themselves, descending on the Capitol when controlled demolition is so obvious, does not represent in any shape or form a "controlled information situation". But in any case, 9/11 was a psyop. They don't do their psyops half-arsed. They do them according to the rules and they need only their masterful propaganda techniques, their intimidatory power and their numerous collaborators. Nothing more. Only the things needed and wanted for real are done for real and everything else is faked. Real death and injury were not needed nor wanted in the least.
Truth mixed with lies
Their method was ingenious. They transformed a truth liability into a magical propaganda asset! Among other propaganda techniques, they created “disinformation agents” who indicate, in one way or another, that they know or suspect the buildings came down by controlled demolition or in other ways suspect government involvement while at the same time tell a story of a loved one or associates perishing in the buildings. It is such a clever mix of truth (or a distorted version of it) with the one fundamental lie that the power elite must have everyone believe: many people tragically died and were injured. Truth mixed with lies. I’m not sure there is a better way to misdirect people and push a lie than to mix it with truth.
The groups anticipated by the perpetrators
The propaganda model showing the foundation belief
The importance of the foundation belief and how it is managed through truther-targeted propaganda
Group 1 members will tend to remain unreceptive to the truth while they believe that 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured because they won’t accept that the US government would have killed 3,000 and injured 6,000 of their own citizens in the buildings … and they are correct in their non-acceptance! It would not be part of the power elite’s modus operandi to do that. It’s nothing to do with them not being evil enough – because, of course, they’re fine with their soldiers getting killed and suiciding after service in self-generated wars and killing up to hundreds of thousands in other countries – but they wouldn’t conduct an operation like that except for very, very good reasons and there weren’t any.
If Group 2 members wish to persuade Group 1 members of the truth they need to understand the whole truth themselves: that 3,000 did not die and 6,000 were not injured.
However, the change of belief necessary for this has its own problems. Death is a taboo and highly-sensitive subject and it is a human characteristic that when it is stated that people have died it feels very offensive, almost sacrilegious to question or contradict this statement, no matter what side of the conspiracy fence you are on. Nothing could be handier than this characteristic though to the power elite when implementing their psyops. They exploit it cynically and ruthlessly to intimidate the population into refraining from questioning alleged deaths and injuries thus making it so much easier to maintain their lies. So very much more research has gone into the building collapses and the plane crashes than into the alleged deaths and injuries and yet this is where a fundamentally important truth lies.
While the majority will believe the 3,000-dead-6,000-injured claim because it fits perfectly into the official story there is danger that those who recognise the other 9/11 lies will start to question the claim, so the perpetrators devised a propaganda campaign just for us, the truthers – so generous of them.
The disinformation agents
Surely, I should have recognised it sooner, especially as others already had. But, no, it was only very recently and seemingly randomly, while half-watching an autoplay YouTube video about William Rodriguez, alleged janitor, and “last man out” of the North Tower before it fell, that the pennies started to drop about the “special” propaganda campaign. Rodriguez testified that he experienced explosions before the tower fell which would suggest controlled demolition but he was also hailed as a hero who’d helped “hundreds” evacuate from the building. It suddenly struck me as anomalous that someone saying things that incriminated the government would be awarded for heroism by it. I then thought of a number of other whistleblower types and could see how they might be disinformation agents hired to align themselves with the truthers while at the same time pushing evidence of deaths and injuries. These agents put out that they:
The Jersey Widows
The Jersey Widows are four widows of men who died in the towers. We were told that along with Bob McIlvaine they fought very hard for a commission inquiry into the events of 9/11. When they posed the question to the proposed chair, Henry Kissinger, "Do you happen to have a client by the name of bin Laden?" apparently, "the usually unflappable Kissinger, nearly fell off his chair." It was this triumphant question that had him replaced by Philip Zelikow, who was, unfortunately, no less of an insider than Kissinger. We were shown 300 questions they posed to the commission of which only a small number were answered and mostly not satisfactorily. It is interesting how willing the power elite are to expose themselves for propaganda purposes ... although they never reveal anything that isn't already in the public domain. Clever, isn't it? If it's already in the public domain why worry about "revealing" it in their "truth mixed with lies" propaganda.
Bob McIlvaine
Bob McIlvaine is the father of Bobby McIlvaine who died in the lobby of one of the twin towers from an explosion before it came down. Bob appears to be an extremely vocal fighter for 9/11 truth and has joined forces with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth which I believe has many genuine members but is obviously infiltrated.
Below is a photo of Bobby with his mother and father. Notice how the hand around his mother has red on the fingernails and a thumb ring. This seems inconsistent with Bobby’s image. Also notice that his arm across his father’s back extends into the air rather strangely and tapers to his wrist prematurely.
Group 1 members will tend to remain unreceptive to the truth while they believe that 3,000 people died and 6,000 were injured because they won’t accept that the US government would have killed 3,000 and injured 6,000 of their own citizens in the buildings … and they are correct in their non-acceptance! It would not be part of the power elite’s modus operandi to do that. It’s nothing to do with them not being evil enough – because, of course, they’re fine with their soldiers getting killed and suiciding after service in self-generated wars and killing up to hundreds of thousands in other countries – but they wouldn’t conduct an operation like that except for very, very good reasons and there weren’t any.
If Group 2 members wish to persuade Group 1 members of the truth they need to understand the whole truth themselves: that 3,000 did not die and 6,000 were not injured.
However, the change of belief necessary for this has its own problems. Death is a taboo and highly-sensitive subject and it is a human characteristic that when it is stated that people have died it feels very offensive, almost sacrilegious to question or contradict this statement, no matter what side of the conspiracy fence you are on. Nothing could be handier than this characteristic though to the power elite when implementing their psyops. They exploit it cynically and ruthlessly to intimidate the population into refraining from questioning alleged deaths and injuries thus making it so much easier to maintain their lies. So very much more research has gone into the building collapses and the plane crashes than into the alleged deaths and injuries and yet this is where a fundamentally important truth lies.
While the majority will believe the 3,000-dead-6,000-injured claim because it fits perfectly into the official story there is danger that those who recognise the other 9/11 lies will start to question the claim, so the perpetrators devised a propaganda campaign just for us, the truthers – so generous of them.
The disinformation agents
Surely, I should have recognised it sooner, especially as others already had. But, no, it was only very recently and seemingly randomly, while half-watching an autoplay YouTube video about William Rodriguez, alleged janitor, and “last man out” of the North Tower before it fell, that the pennies started to drop about the “special” propaganda campaign. Rodriguez testified that he experienced explosions before the tower fell which would suggest controlled demolition but he was also hailed as a hero who’d helped “hundreds” evacuate from the building. It suddenly struck me as anomalous that someone saying things that incriminated the government would be awarded for heroism by it. I then thought of a number of other whistleblower types and could see how they might be disinformation agents hired to align themselves with the truthers while at the same time pushing evidence of deaths and injuries. These agents put out that they:
- believe or suspect the government was responsible
- recognise controlled demolition in the collapses of the towers or even contribute to research showing it was responsible for the collapses
- saw evidence only of a bomb, not of a plane impact at the Pentagon
- experienced explosions in the towers before they fell
- are whistleblowers of one kind or another
- claim that they are the loved ones or associates of those killed in the buildings or otherwise promote the idea of injury and/or death as told to us by the media.
The Jersey Widows
The Jersey Widows are four widows of men who died in the towers. We were told that along with Bob McIlvaine they fought very hard for a commission inquiry into the events of 9/11. When they posed the question to the proposed chair, Henry Kissinger, "Do you happen to have a client by the name of bin Laden?" apparently, "the usually unflappable Kissinger, nearly fell off his chair." It was this triumphant question that had him replaced by Philip Zelikow, who was, unfortunately, no less of an insider than Kissinger. We were shown 300 questions they posed to the commission of which only a small number were answered and mostly not satisfactorily. It is interesting how willing the power elite are to expose themselves for propaganda purposes ... although they never reveal anything that isn't already in the public domain. Clever, isn't it? If it's already in the public domain why worry about "revealing" it in their "truth mixed with lies" propaganda.
Bob McIlvaine
Bob McIlvaine is the father of Bobby McIlvaine who died in the lobby of one of the twin towers from an explosion before it came down. Bob appears to be an extremely vocal fighter for 9/11 truth and has joined forces with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth which I believe has many genuine members but is obviously infiltrated.
Below is a photo of Bobby with his mother and father. Notice how the hand around his mother has red on the fingernails and a thumb ring. This seems inconsistent with Bobby’s image. Also notice that his arm across his father’s back extends into the air rather strangely and tapers to his wrist prematurely.
Below is a photo of Bobby with his parents and brother. Notice the position of his hand on top of his father's and seemingly against his brother’s cheek, with thumb ring and bracelet. He also seems to have an earring but it looks a little strange. These elements are inconsistent with the trouser, tie and shirt outfit. There is a straight line formed between his mother’s dress and his trousers which is not consistent with the line formed when a person is leaning against another.
This strange doctoring of photos is a typical "sign" given to us from the perpetrators. They must give signs of their crimes against us.
Richard Grove
Richard Grove was fired for questioning his employer, Marsh & McLennan, about anomalous fiscal transactions. His former colleagues urged him to present his evidence which was to happen in a meeting on the morning of 9/11 on the 98th floor of the North tower, however, Richard hadn’t left the house early enough to attend this crucial meeting, getting stuck in traffic, while his co-workers perished. Transcript of a statement made by Richard Grove. It is both highly implausible that Richard would be attending such a meeting in the office from which he was fired and that he missed such an important meeting due to “getting stuck in traffic” (another "sign").
The power elite so capable of this heinous crime
Another example of propaganda to persuade the truthers that people were killed in the buildings was in pushing out that they, the power elite, were quite capable of sacrificing their citizens for their agenda. In the months before 9/11, two documents made appearances on the internet:
For greater plausibility, outsiders did the actual dastardly act of killing all those people in the buildings
The "dancing Israelis", picked up in a road block whose van showed traces of explosives dust and the Israeli "art students" in the buildings were staged to make truthers believe Israelis were commissioned to bring the buildings down. Not to say Israelis didn't bring the buildings down - perhaps they're especially skilled at it - however, why on earth would they inform us of it? The obvious explanation is that having "outsiders" perform the dastardly act makes the story more plausible than US citizens performing it (it's interesting how they go for plausibility in some ways but against it in others - it's an art form). No doubt, they also enjoy distracting and getting zealous anti-Zionists in a lather too. Israelis did it! Israelis did it! The fact is it made no difference whether the CIA, Mossad or a demolition company did it because we can infer a full evacuation was conducted. It's interesting that they put the highly anomalous casting of suspicion on Israelis in the mainstream media, knowing that the believers of the 19-terrorists-armed-with-boxcutters story will pay little attention while the truthers will latch right onto it. Isn't it fascinating how propaganda can be directed in that way? Two groups of people will read exactly the same content but will respond differently ... and the perps know that so very, very well. It's like magic ... until you know the trick.
Gradually moving "prominent truther" focus to be on the buildings
While in the earlier years of 9/11 there was focus on both the planes and the buildings, we can see a gradual shift towards the buildings. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth massively dominate the 9/11 truth arena and have a flash website whereas Pilots for 9/11 Truth is a moribund organisation. Controlled opposition must concern itself with the planes as genuine truthers will take great interest in them so they must occupy that space and take control but over time their control is in the form of having the organisation bow out. We can see a very good reason for A&E supplanting the pilots:
It is easy to persuade truthers of partial rather than complete evacuation of the buildings whereas faked planes necessarily means faked deaths and they want our noses turned away from anything to do with fakery of death.
WTC-7's collapse was planned as part of the effort to focus concentration on the buildings. While it may seem like the smoking gun (and partly is) it is also very importantly a kind of Trojan Horse, diverting truthers from the pivotal truth: staged death and injury. See my page, Why collapse WTC-7 by perfect implosion on 9/11 ... when they didn't have to?
It is also interesting to note that 60 aerospace engineers have signed onto A&E to speak about the buildings! Why aren't they talking about the plane fakery?
Distraction
Controlled demolition
They have concentrated the focus on the buildings as stated above.
Multiple theories
There was a great push of a number of theories on what was used to bring the buildings down (nuclear, directed energy weapons, thermite, nanothermite, thermate, etc) and what kind of aeronautical machines crashed into the buildings (passenger airliners, missiles, military jets, etc). In this they are aided by the people themselves as we all have our own opinions. The different theories create factionalism and weaken the truth movement.
They also serve as major distraction. The key points are that the buildings came down by controlled demolition and the footage of Flight 175 into the South Tower is obviously faked. Either one of those is all the information required to know that it was an inside conspiracy - exactly how it was done and what materials were used are of little relevance. And yet how many pages and pages of material are there on what was involved in the controlled demolitions and what crashed into the buildings?
Vast number of exercises
One could suspect that the vast number of exercises the truthers were made aware of, including an anti-hijacker drill - can you believe it? - is also an example of distraction. All the other drills distracted us from exploring the possibility of yet more drills used to produce all the "evidence" of the injured.
Israel, Israel, Israel
Of course, Israel was involved but so were many other nations including my own, Australia. It was no coincidence that Little Johnny Howard happened to be in Washington on the fateful day with front row seats to the greatest terror event the world has ever known. The purpose of the massive focus on Israel is to stir up anti-Zionist zealotry ... and, as always, keep people away from the simple truth that the essential physical truths of 9/11 are damage to and destruction of buildings - that's it in a nutshell. It is utterly absurd the way Israel is made to look as if it was actually responsible for 9/11. Whoever did what it was all under the auspices of the US government.
Richard Grove
Richard Grove was fired for questioning his employer, Marsh & McLennan, about anomalous fiscal transactions. His former colleagues urged him to present his evidence which was to happen in a meeting on the morning of 9/11 on the 98th floor of the North tower, however, Richard hadn’t left the house early enough to attend this crucial meeting, getting stuck in traffic, while his co-workers perished. Transcript of a statement made by Richard Grove. It is both highly implausible that Richard would be attending such a meeting in the office from which he was fired and that he missed such an important meeting due to “getting stuck in traffic” (another "sign").
The power elite so capable of this heinous crime
Another example of propaganda to persuade the truthers that people were killed in the buildings was in pushing out that they, the power elite, were quite capable of sacrificing their citizens for their agenda. In the months before 9/11, two documents made appearances on the internet:
- In September 2000, a document was released by right-wing think tank Project for a New American Century (PNAC) stating that what was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world’s resources was “some catastrophic and catalysing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” This could easily be a document designed simply to make the anticipated truthers believe that the perpetrators had no qualms about killing citizens in order to succeed in their quest for global supremacy. Would they really produce such a blatant document otherwise?
- In April 2001, a classified document detailing plans for false-flag operations in the 1960s code-named Operation Northwoods (containing some of the elements of 9/11) was released on the internet. This document may well be real, however, its release date is interesting.
For greater plausibility, outsiders did the actual dastardly act of killing all those people in the buildings
The "dancing Israelis", picked up in a road block whose van showed traces of explosives dust and the Israeli "art students" in the buildings were staged to make truthers believe Israelis were commissioned to bring the buildings down. Not to say Israelis didn't bring the buildings down - perhaps they're especially skilled at it - however, why on earth would they inform us of it? The obvious explanation is that having "outsiders" perform the dastardly act makes the story more plausible than US citizens performing it (it's interesting how they go for plausibility in some ways but against it in others - it's an art form). No doubt, they also enjoy distracting and getting zealous anti-Zionists in a lather too. Israelis did it! Israelis did it! The fact is it made no difference whether the CIA, Mossad or a demolition company did it because we can infer a full evacuation was conducted. It's interesting that they put the highly anomalous casting of suspicion on Israelis in the mainstream media, knowing that the believers of the 19-terrorists-armed-with-boxcutters story will pay little attention while the truthers will latch right onto it. Isn't it fascinating how propaganda can be directed in that way? Two groups of people will read exactly the same content but will respond differently ... and the perps know that so very, very well. It's like magic ... until you know the trick.
Gradually moving "prominent truther" focus to be on the buildings
While in the earlier years of 9/11 there was focus on both the planes and the buildings, we can see a gradual shift towards the buildings. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth massively dominate the 9/11 truth arena and have a flash website whereas Pilots for 9/11 Truth is a moribund organisation. Controlled opposition must concern itself with the planes as genuine truthers will take great interest in them so they must occupy that space and take control but over time their control is in the form of having the organisation bow out. We can see a very good reason for A&E supplanting the pilots:
It is easy to persuade truthers of partial rather than complete evacuation of the buildings whereas faked planes necessarily means faked deaths and they want our noses turned away from anything to do with fakery of death.
WTC-7's collapse was planned as part of the effort to focus concentration on the buildings. While it may seem like the smoking gun (and partly is) it is also very importantly a kind of Trojan Horse, diverting truthers from the pivotal truth: staged death and injury. See my page, Why collapse WTC-7 by perfect implosion on 9/11 ... when they didn't have to?
It is also interesting to note that 60 aerospace engineers have signed onto A&E to speak about the buildings! Why aren't they talking about the plane fakery?
Distraction
Controlled demolition
They have concentrated the focus on the buildings as stated above.
Multiple theories
There was a great push of a number of theories on what was used to bring the buildings down (nuclear, directed energy weapons, thermite, nanothermite, thermate, etc) and what kind of aeronautical machines crashed into the buildings (passenger airliners, missiles, military jets, etc). In this they are aided by the people themselves as we all have our own opinions. The different theories create factionalism and weaken the truth movement.
They also serve as major distraction. The key points are that the buildings came down by controlled demolition and the footage of Flight 175 into the South Tower is obviously faked. Either one of those is all the information required to know that it was an inside conspiracy - exactly how it was done and what materials were used are of little relevance. And yet how many pages and pages of material are there on what was involved in the controlled demolitions and what crashed into the buildings?
Vast number of exercises
One could suspect that the vast number of exercises the truthers were made aware of, including an anti-hijacker drill - can you believe it? - is also an example of distraction. All the other drills distracted us from exploring the possibility of yet more drills used to produce all the "evidence" of the injured.
Israel, Israel, Israel
Of course, Israel was involved but so were many other nations including my own, Australia. It was no coincidence that Little Johnny Howard happened to be in Washington on the fateful day with front row seats to the greatest terror event the world has ever known. The purpose of the massive focus on Israel is to stir up anti-Zionist zealotry ... and, as always, keep people away from the simple truth that the essential physical truths of 9/11 are damage to and destruction of buildings - that's it in a nutshell. It is utterly absurd the way Israel is made to look as if it was actually responsible for 9/11. Whoever did what it was all under the auspices of the US government.