MANCHESTER BOMBING - 22 MAY 2017
A truth’s initial commotion is directly proportional to how deeply the lie was believed. It wasn’t the world being round that agitated people, but that the world wasn’t flat.
When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.
Dresden James
When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims. The most perfect slaves are, therefore, those which blissfully and unawaredly enslave themselves.
Dresden James
Hypothesis 1 (H1) – Staged event (essentially a drill) toned down because of the children (minimum of blood and no children around blood). In tandem to the staged event hypothesis are signs of sloppiness, ridiculousness and clues which the power elite use to justify their hoaxing of us and if we don't pick it up it's our own fault.
Hypothesis 2 (H2) – Real bombing where 22 people died, 250 were injured (number jumped from 119 around the time of the bombing) and victims suffered shrapnel wounds
All 10 points below support Hypothesis 1 (H1) better than Hypothesis 2 (H2)
1. There is no media footage (or mobile phone footage shown by the media) and only a single image of the bomb scene on the internet, a single image that is shown at different levels of crop and zoom in the various publications.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/foyer-full-of-young-girls-wearing-kitten-ears-was-the-softest-target-3kc0l25cj
Observations about this image:
Hypothesis 2 (H2) – Real bombing where 22 people died, 250 were injured (number jumped from 119 around the time of the bombing) and victims suffered shrapnel wounds
All 10 points below support Hypothesis 1 (H1) better than Hypothesis 2 (H2)
1. There is no media footage (or mobile phone footage shown by the media) and only a single image of the bomb scene on the internet, a single image that is shown at different levels of crop and zoom in the various publications.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/foyer-full-of-young-girls-wearing-kitten-ears-was-the-softest-target-3kc0l25cj
Observations about this image:
- It is unclear
- We cannot identify:
- specific injuries or maiming
- people writhing in pain (wounds from shrapnel are extremely painful)
- dead bodies or body parts
- children
- medical staff and equipment
- destruction
- sense of urgency
- It appears someone is holding some kind of swab to someone's head where we see no blood and the swabber looks unengaged
- We can only wonder at what the two parallel tracks of blood indicate
- Overall, I think it's fair to say that this indicates much more the scene of an anti-terrorist (or similar) drill than a real bomb scene where 22 people were killed and 250 injured.
From 1:25 in this video, Six Undeniable Proofs The Manchester Bombing Is A Staged Government Event, we see leaked footage of the same location seemingly earlier, but after the alleged bomb blast occurred, with people lying down as in the photo above and others walking around in casual fashion giving no indication by their behaviour that a bomb has exploded killing 22 and injuring 250. A woman walking along appears to have a patch of blood on her jeans from which one might infer she is a crisis actor hired to play a victim.
COMMENT:
For H2 we would expect:
Media video footage (or, at least, mobile phone footage shown by the media), more images - images showing medical staff attending to the injured with equipment etc, a better quality of the single image, a significantly greater number of people, people writhing in pain, children, sense of destruction, sense of urgency. We would not expect the content of the leaked footage at all. Image and leaked footage support H1 much better than H2.
2. The girl in this video is alleged to have been injured by the bomb but there is no obvious injury shown in the video (the blood could easily be fake) or real sense of pain and there is no sense that there are others injured around her.
COMMENT: This video supports H1 better than H2.
3. We are told, in a highly-packaged BBC interview, by lead children’s orthopaedic surgeon, Dr Ibrar Majid, “What we saw was essentially war wounds so the kinds of wounds you would see on a battlefield.” This is what we are shown: the Queen visiting children sporting bracelet-bandages in hospital beds not surrounded by any equipment and giving no signs of suffering from "wounds from a battlefield".
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4541026/The-Queen-visits-Royal-Manchester-Children-s-Hospital.html
COMMENT:
For H2 we would expect:
Media video footage (or, at least, mobile phone footage shown by the media), more images - images showing medical staff attending to the injured with equipment etc, a better quality of the single image, a significantly greater number of people, people writhing in pain, children, sense of destruction, sense of urgency. We would not expect the content of the leaked footage at all. Image and leaked footage support H1 much better than H2.
2. The girl in this video is alleged to have been injured by the bomb but there is no obvious injury shown in the video (the blood could easily be fake) or real sense of pain and there is no sense that there are others injured around her.
COMMENT: This video supports H1 better than H2.
3. We are told, in a highly-packaged BBC interview, by lead children’s orthopaedic surgeon, Dr Ibrar Majid, “What we saw was essentially war wounds so the kinds of wounds you would see on a battlefield.” This is what we are shown: the Queen visiting children sporting bracelet-bandages in hospital beds not surrounded by any equipment and giving no signs of suffering from "wounds from a battlefield".
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4541026/The-Queen-visits-Royal-Manchester-Children-s-Hospital.html
COMMENT: The seeming lack of injury requiring hospitalisation to these children supports H1 better than H2. One would imagine that with the number of seriously injured people, people with lesser injuries would not be taking up valuable space in hospital but really these children do not show convincing signs of any injury.
4a. Note: I've had to downgrade this point to "4a" and have put a new point 4 because the video linked to in The Sun has been removed. There is a record though even if the video is no longer viewable on the Wayback Machine which nonsensically gives the single publication date of 25 November 2020 when it was originally published at some time in 2017.
Bizarre behaviour by parents of victim, Martyn Hett. Many people do not believe that the parents in this video are credible. This is a comment on the video by someone who hitherto had had no suspicions of Manchester or any prior events being staged.
"Holy Shit. I am really shocked. The mother actually says her boy would be happy to be dead to get all this media attention. OK, I know grief can be strange, but – really? saying your kid would be happy to be dead and famous is beyond anything I can easily accept as normal. At best it’s sociopathic. At worst…I don’t know! I just do not know what to think.
These two seem utterly unmoved, smiling, calm. Not bravely smiling through the pain. Just regular smiling and unmoved. WTF is that?
And why is she sitting there with an arm full of the dolls she makes like some sort of freakish product placement? And as I said what are the odds this “son of the year” who was all over the media a couple of years ago for what seems like quite odd reasons of itself, is now in the media again for being a victim of terror?
I am genuinely shaken and genuinely confused. I have never bothered to look at any of this alleged fakery before. I have to have a long think about this and ask some trusted friends to view the video.
It’s insane."
COMMENT: Bizarre behaviour by parents supports H1 better than H2.
4. For this point I simply link you to the excellent analysis by UK Critical Thinker of Martin Hibbert. (All 40 of UK Critical Thinker's videos can be seen on Richard D. Hall's site and they are highly recommended. However, despite the great service Richard D. Hall provides in publishing these 40 videos he shows himself to be "controlled opposition" as explained by Miri AF.)
5. Lack of credibility of this article and selfie-video of father, Nick Bickerstaff, looking for his daughter, Ellen. The reason given for him videoing himself is that in case there is a second blast that kills him, he wants to have a record of his final moments as a memento for his family. He laments that all the people walking past him are laughing because they can’t see what's behind him: "People blasted to bits and half their bodies are everywhere," although his footage shows no hint of this.
COMMENT: That the people in the background do not show signs they know a fatal explosion has occurred and the general problem with credibility of Nick Bickerstaff's wailing and selfying with no footage of the "blasted to bits" bodies he mentions fit H1 better than H2. People comment that the way Nick calls his daughter, Ellen, reminds them of the comic video of the prairie dog calling Alan - all in keeping with the deliberate ridiculousness that the power elite employ to justify their hoaxing of us. The deliberate undermining of credibility and general lack of attempt at making these events appear as realistic as possible also explains why no one has been able to respond to the $5,000 challenge. If they'd actually set off a bomb at Manchester as they did in Mogadishu (but there they kept the people away) and they'd attempted realism with the wounds as in Hollywood films then it would be so much harder to try to prove the case that this event was staged but it is laughably easy - and obviously impossible to try to prove the other way.
6. Smiliness of this witness. She wasn’t an actual victim but she seems very smiley for having been in close vicinity of such a horrible event that killed 22 and injured 250.
COMMENT: Smiliness of this very near-to-the-event witness supports H1 better than H2. Incongruous smiling and laughing in testimony of staged events is often referred to by analysts as "duping delight", the delight that is felt by those duping others which shows on their faces involuntarily. While it could be that the incongruous smiling and laughing we see in these events is sometimes indeed "duping delight" in others it is so very obvious that it cannot simply be involuntary and just one of their deliberate giveaway signs that they are duping us.
7. Ambulances in a very long congaline moving slowly along the street heading to the bomb scene. Someone interviewed by the media says, “We tested a scenario not that dissimilar to this one month ago.” Inference could be made that footage was of the ambulances in the drill a month before, not on the night in question.
COMMENT: In a real event we wouldn’t expect so many ambulances all together and we would expect them to be moving much faster. Slow-moving ambulances in a congaline supports H1 better than H2.
8. The media reported on three heroes, including two homeless men and a woman.
One man, Chris Parker, said he comforted a girl who had lost her legs and cradled a dying woman in his arms while the other, Stephen Jones, said he pulled nails out of children’s arms and faces.
In this video by UK Critical Thinker about the female hero, Paula Robinson, we see the following anomalies and questions raised:
The strangeness and lack of digital evidence of these stories supports H1 better than H2.
9. Nearby firefighters felt shame and anger at being stopped from attending the bomb scene for 90 minutes.
“They prepared to go to the scene, but were instead told to rendezvous at Philips Park station. They waited there for an hour, and were told they had to wait for ‘specialists’ who had bulletproof overalls to arrive from Leigh and Heywood before being sent back to Manchester Central. Finally they got the go-ahead to go.”
COMMENT: This contrived-sounding reason to delay firefighters attending the scene supports H1 better than H2. One could infer that this responder team wasn't "in on" the event for whatever reason so they needed not to be exposed to the staging. This is reminiscent of Sandy Hook where medical staff set up at the firehouse instead of the school, a few hundred feet away.
10. General lack of digital or other evidence of anything one could say indicates a bomb blast that killed 22 people and injured 250: no evidence of maiming, carnage, destruction, anguish or medical attention.
COMMENT: This lack of evidence supports H1 better than H2.
1.15 hour film by UK Critical Thinker on the Manchester Bombing - highly recommended as are his entire catalogue of 40 videos on the Manchester event!
Personal extra
I spoke with a friend who lives near Manchester a couple of months after the event and when I told her it was staged she said, “Oh, but we know the parents of a girl who goes to school with a girl whose mother died.” Almost in the next breath though she said, “No evil from these people would surprise me.” As we were talking, she was cogitating and said, “You know, the family of the youngest child who died [Saffie Roussos] was on TV this morning and they talked about how her mother was in hospital still recovering from serious injuries. I guess if the child weren't dead she’d need someone to look after her, the most likely person being her mother so this might explain why the mother is 'still in hospital'." Of course, in the case of it being a hoax, she wouldn't be in hospital, she and her daughter would be sequestered off somewhere! My friend did not switch to believing, in the course of our conversation (and probably still hasn’t), that the event was definitely staged but I was amazed at the way she readily accepted it as a possibility and, although she had had no notion of this or any other event being staged until 5 minutes before, was working out a possible aspect of the modus operandi! I never would have made the connection myself. The family are "reluctantly" selling their chippy because the now wheelchair-bound mum cannot work in the fish shop anymore and they're hoping that the new owners will rename it Saffie's Place. Now I wonder if selling up means they're going to move and, if so, I wonder where they might be moving to - a nice little Greek island perhaps? (Mum, who was discharged from hospital for the day, looking decidedly unwheelchair-bound at the funeral.)
Funnily enough, another friend has a daughter in the same class as the Australian child, Julian Cadman, who supposedly died in Barcelona (they generally have people from other countries involved to make it of global concern) and – wouldn’t you know it – the mother will be in hospital for awhile with serious injuries. My friend told me how her lovely young daughter has been traumatised. It makes me very angry that children are being exploited and traumatised by these staged events and that people are being fleeced for fundraising. This friend does not accept the possibility that the event was staged and I daren't ask her, for the moment, if Julian's mother, Jom, has returned to the family home or if the family has packed up (without her) to join her and Julian elsewhere presumably.
NOTE: No vociferous supporter of the "real event" hypothesis has been able to respond to my $5,000 10-point Occam's Razor challenge issued in October 2017 to produce an equivalent exercise favouring their hypothesis.
4a. Note: I've had to downgrade this point to "4a" and have put a new point 4 because the video linked to in The Sun has been removed. There is a record though even if the video is no longer viewable on the Wayback Machine which nonsensically gives the single publication date of 25 November 2020 when it was originally published at some time in 2017.
Bizarre behaviour by parents of victim, Martyn Hett. Many people do not believe that the parents in this video are credible. This is a comment on the video by someone who hitherto had had no suspicions of Manchester or any prior events being staged.
"Holy Shit. I am really shocked. The mother actually says her boy would be happy to be dead to get all this media attention. OK, I know grief can be strange, but – really? saying your kid would be happy to be dead and famous is beyond anything I can easily accept as normal. At best it’s sociopathic. At worst…I don’t know! I just do not know what to think.
These two seem utterly unmoved, smiling, calm. Not bravely smiling through the pain. Just regular smiling and unmoved. WTF is that?
And why is she sitting there with an arm full of the dolls she makes like some sort of freakish product placement? And as I said what are the odds this “son of the year” who was all over the media a couple of years ago for what seems like quite odd reasons of itself, is now in the media again for being a victim of terror?
I am genuinely shaken and genuinely confused. I have never bothered to look at any of this alleged fakery before. I have to have a long think about this and ask some trusted friends to view the video.
It’s insane."
COMMENT: Bizarre behaviour by parents supports H1 better than H2.
4. For this point I simply link you to the excellent analysis by UK Critical Thinker of Martin Hibbert. (All 40 of UK Critical Thinker's videos can be seen on Richard D. Hall's site and they are highly recommended. However, despite the great service Richard D. Hall provides in publishing these 40 videos he shows himself to be "controlled opposition" as explained by Miri AF.)
5. Lack of credibility of this article and selfie-video of father, Nick Bickerstaff, looking for his daughter, Ellen. The reason given for him videoing himself is that in case there is a second blast that kills him, he wants to have a record of his final moments as a memento for his family. He laments that all the people walking past him are laughing because they can’t see what's behind him: "People blasted to bits and half their bodies are everywhere," although his footage shows no hint of this.
COMMENT: That the people in the background do not show signs they know a fatal explosion has occurred and the general problem with credibility of Nick Bickerstaff's wailing and selfying with no footage of the "blasted to bits" bodies he mentions fit H1 better than H2. People comment that the way Nick calls his daughter, Ellen, reminds them of the comic video of the prairie dog calling Alan - all in keeping with the deliberate ridiculousness that the power elite employ to justify their hoaxing of us. The deliberate undermining of credibility and general lack of attempt at making these events appear as realistic as possible also explains why no one has been able to respond to the $5,000 challenge. If they'd actually set off a bomb at Manchester as they did in Mogadishu (but there they kept the people away) and they'd attempted realism with the wounds as in Hollywood films then it would be so much harder to try to prove the case that this event was staged but it is laughably easy - and obviously impossible to try to prove the other way.
6. Smiliness of this witness. She wasn’t an actual victim but she seems very smiley for having been in close vicinity of such a horrible event that killed 22 and injured 250.
COMMENT: Smiliness of this very near-to-the-event witness supports H1 better than H2. Incongruous smiling and laughing in testimony of staged events is often referred to by analysts as "duping delight", the delight that is felt by those duping others which shows on their faces involuntarily. While it could be that the incongruous smiling and laughing we see in these events is sometimes indeed "duping delight" in others it is so very obvious that it cannot simply be involuntary and just one of their deliberate giveaway signs that they are duping us.
7. Ambulances in a very long congaline moving slowly along the street heading to the bomb scene. Someone interviewed by the media says, “We tested a scenario not that dissimilar to this one month ago.” Inference could be made that footage was of the ambulances in the drill a month before, not on the night in question.
COMMENT: In a real event we wouldn’t expect so many ambulances all together and we would expect them to be moving much faster. Slow-moving ambulances in a congaline supports H1 better than H2.
8. The media reported on three heroes, including two homeless men and a woman.
One man, Chris Parker, said he comforted a girl who had lost her legs and cradled a dying woman in his arms while the other, Stephen Jones, said he pulled nails out of children’s arms and faces.
In this video by UK Critical Thinker about the female hero, Paula Robinson, we see the following anomalies and questions raised:
- All the mainstream media came out a few days later to state that the story was fake, yet they did not vilify her for her fake story nor apologise for getting it wrong.
- She says that she found two children who had arranged to meet their dad but she told them she'd take them somewhere else and call their dad. She mentions the two children say they had a friend "on the toilet" but she, seemingly, took them away, leaving that child behind.
- She says that she put out on social media that she had children and she got a massive number of enquiries from parents worried about their children. As we live in the age of the mobile phone one would expect that parents would simply call their children directly, however, as a seeming explanation for why this might have been difficult, she says "there must have been an awful lot of children that dropped their handbags, dropped their purses, hadn't got their phone."
- She says that in answer to the parents' frantic enquiries about whether she has the children or not she says that she told them, "I haven't". This implies categorically she didn't have any children where, if she were telling the truth, she might have had the children.
- She says that at the time of the bombing she and her husband were returning from an anniversary dinner at Victoria Station, however, the closing time of the only restaurant in the station is 7 or 8pm and one wonders why they would have chosen this location for such a special meal.
- She says that she started to shout, "Everyone make their way to the Holiday Inn", because she thought that on exiting the arena everyone would be able to see it as a landmark, however, the only hotel she could be referring to as a landmark from the arena was the Premier Inn. Both hotels came out and said that they had not had any children come in.
- She talks about how her father was a fireman and made her and her siblings effectively do fire drills at home and suggests that it's probably good for people to have a little plan for this kind of thing.
The strangeness and lack of digital evidence of these stories supports H1 better than H2.
9. Nearby firefighters felt shame and anger at being stopped from attending the bomb scene for 90 minutes.
“They prepared to go to the scene, but were instead told to rendezvous at Philips Park station. They waited there for an hour, and were told they had to wait for ‘specialists’ who had bulletproof overalls to arrive from Leigh and Heywood before being sent back to Manchester Central. Finally they got the go-ahead to go.”
COMMENT: This contrived-sounding reason to delay firefighters attending the scene supports H1 better than H2. One could infer that this responder team wasn't "in on" the event for whatever reason so they needed not to be exposed to the staging. This is reminiscent of Sandy Hook where medical staff set up at the firehouse instead of the school, a few hundred feet away.
10. General lack of digital or other evidence of anything one could say indicates a bomb blast that killed 22 people and injured 250: no evidence of maiming, carnage, destruction, anguish or medical attention.
COMMENT: This lack of evidence supports H1 better than H2.
1.15 hour film by UK Critical Thinker on the Manchester Bombing - highly recommended as are his entire catalogue of 40 videos on the Manchester event!
Personal extra
I spoke with a friend who lives near Manchester a couple of months after the event and when I told her it was staged she said, “Oh, but we know the parents of a girl who goes to school with a girl whose mother died.” Almost in the next breath though she said, “No evil from these people would surprise me.” As we were talking, she was cogitating and said, “You know, the family of the youngest child who died [Saffie Roussos] was on TV this morning and they talked about how her mother was in hospital still recovering from serious injuries. I guess if the child weren't dead she’d need someone to look after her, the most likely person being her mother so this might explain why the mother is 'still in hospital'." Of course, in the case of it being a hoax, she wouldn't be in hospital, she and her daughter would be sequestered off somewhere! My friend did not switch to believing, in the course of our conversation (and probably still hasn’t), that the event was definitely staged but I was amazed at the way she readily accepted it as a possibility and, although she had had no notion of this or any other event being staged until 5 minutes before, was working out a possible aspect of the modus operandi! I never would have made the connection myself. The family are "reluctantly" selling their chippy because the now wheelchair-bound mum cannot work in the fish shop anymore and they're hoping that the new owners will rename it Saffie's Place. Now I wonder if selling up means they're going to move and, if so, I wonder where they might be moving to - a nice little Greek island perhaps? (Mum, who was discharged from hospital for the day, looking decidedly unwheelchair-bound at the funeral.)
Funnily enough, another friend has a daughter in the same class as the Australian child, Julian Cadman, who supposedly died in Barcelona (they generally have people from other countries involved to make it of global concern) and – wouldn’t you know it – the mother will be in hospital for awhile with serious injuries. My friend told me how her lovely young daughter has been traumatised. It makes me very angry that children are being exploited and traumatised by these staged events and that people are being fleeced for fundraising. This friend does not accept the possibility that the event was staged and I daren't ask her, for the moment, if Julian's mother, Jom, has returned to the family home or if the family has packed up (without her) to join her and Julian elsewhere presumably.
NOTE: No vociferous supporter of the "real event" hypothesis has been able to respond to my $5,000 10-point Occam's Razor challenge issued in October 2017 to produce an equivalent exercise favouring their hypothesis.
Widget is loading comments...