They tell us clearly ... and have a good old chortle while they're about it
The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.
Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist.
My emphasis.
When the power elite foist hoaxery upon us - seemingly very counterintuitively - they often prime us in advance, tell us during and also tell us after. and they are meticulous in never presenting a single piece of their hoaxery in such a way that a believer of their story can brandish it to defend their belief. They make us believe a story whose reality cannot be supported by any tangible evidence. It's all smoke'n'mirrors. When you blow away the magic propaganda dust there is absolutely nothing there. It is truly remarkable how they will drown us in propaganda to make us believe something but at the same time tell us that they're hoaxing us.
An exemplar of before, during and after signals is 9/11.
Before: 9/11 presaged in the Simpsons, 1997
During: All the journalists reporting on the collapse of WTC-7 refer to controlled demolition, not fire, and some refer to it having come down before it did.
After: The terrorists pop up alive.
Of course, with all this revelation we can see that many people must be in the know and it gives one pause to think that all these people would be AOK with the callous killing of all those people in the buildings and the planes ... ah but the pivotal truth of 9/11 is that it wasn't a terrorist attack, nor a false flag, but, in fact, a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising many smaller exercises and drills pushed out as a real event. It is no coincidence that the greatest number of military and agency drills in US history occurred on 9/11. That being the case, death and injury had to be staged and this is what the evidence shows us. The only physical realities of the day were the damage to and destruction of buildings while the plane crashes and death and injury were staged. See webpage on 9/11.
Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist.
My emphasis.
When the power elite foist hoaxery upon us - seemingly very counterintuitively - they often prime us in advance, tell us during and also tell us after. and they are meticulous in never presenting a single piece of their hoaxery in such a way that a believer of their story can brandish it to defend their belief. They make us believe a story whose reality cannot be supported by any tangible evidence. It's all smoke'n'mirrors. When you blow away the magic propaganda dust there is absolutely nothing there. It is truly remarkable how they will drown us in propaganda to make us believe something but at the same time tell us that they're hoaxing us.
An exemplar of before, during and after signals is 9/11.
Before: 9/11 presaged in the Simpsons, 1997
During: All the journalists reporting on the collapse of WTC-7 refer to controlled demolition, not fire, and some refer to it having come down before it did.
After: The terrorists pop up alive.
Of course, with all this revelation we can see that many people must be in the know and it gives one pause to think that all these people would be AOK with the callous killing of all those people in the buildings and the planes ... ah but the pivotal truth of 9/11 is that it wasn't a terrorist attack, nor a false flag, but, in fact, a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising many smaller exercises and drills pushed out as a real event. It is no coincidence that the greatest number of military and agency drills in US history occurred on 9/11. That being the case, death and injury had to be staged and this is what the evidence shows us. The only physical realities of the day were the damage to and destruction of buildings while the plane crashes and death and injury were staged. See webpage on 9/11.
I first heard of the basic concept of "revelation of the method" from an insider via the staged event analyst, Ole Dammegard, who said that the power elite always tell us what they're up to with obvious signs including: general sloppiness in attempts at fakery, over-the-top ridiculousness, physical impossibilities, implausibilities, contradictory versions of the story and contradictions within the story, discrepancy between show and tell, the actual truth, Masonic numbers and symbols and on and on because they believe that in telling us they push the onus onto us to call them out and if we don't they're spared karmic repercussions. While trying to pass this golden nugget onto others is proving to be a Herculean endeavour I didn't doubt it for a nanosecond on hearing it myself simply because it explained so many things that had previously baffled me, for example, the owner of WTC-7, Larry Silverstein, saying in relation to the building's collapse that he said to "pull it" (pull it being a term used in controlled demolition relating to the fact that buildings were (and I believe sometimes still are) pulled down by ropes and chains). Its collapse would, of course, not have happened at his command but would have all been pre-planned so saying he said to "pull it" could not have been a slip of the tongue, the giveaway words had to be scripted.
Some say that priming us beforehand softens us up to accept the event more readily. I'm not sure if it has that effect but regardless, the evidence that they signal their hoaxing of us before, during and after is indisputable and I think it's very important to recognise it. Not only do they tell us though - they are scrupulous in ensuring that all parts of their hoaxery can easily be identified. They do not fake a single piece of evidence in such a way that it can be mistaken for real and thus used to support their story which is why my challenge to those who support the official story of events is an impossible one to meet - once the magic dust is blown away - just like the Emperor's New Clothes - there is nothing to be found.
While it may be true that their reasoning for "telling us" is in order to push the onus onto us to call them out and be spared karmic repercussions it is easy to infer at least two other good reasons:
Hypothesis 1 (H1) - the power elite inform us that it is they who are responsible for their covert operations ... and they have a great old laugh about it
Hypothesis 2 (H2) - the power elite do not inform us that it is they who are responsible for their covert operations; any possible sign is an example of a screwup or coincidence or has some other explanation
Hypothesis 3 (H3) - the power elite do not inform us as they do not perform the covert operations claimed, they are events as presented by the media
The following 10 points support H1 over both H2 and H3
1. 9/11 presages - Many instances of allusions to 9/11 in films and other media dating from the 1940s.
2. 9/11 planes and dead body
3. Miracle survivors -
Pearl Harbour - Donald Stratton, miracle survivor of severe burns
With the burns he alleged he suffered he could not possibly have inched his way along a 70ft rope, nor re-enlisted after discharge to fight in 5 crucial invasions, nor is there evidence of any part of his ear missing or burns to his face in images of him. See more.
9/11 - The Miracle Survivors
"I felt the walls next to me crack and buckle on top of me,” [Pasquale Buzzelli] says. Suddenly, he seemed to be in free fall, and the walls seemed to separate and move away from him.
Maybe two hours later, he regained consciousness on a slab of concrete 180 feet below the 22nd floor. (He may be the source of the rumor that someone surfed the collapse and lived.)"
When you watch the tower collapse this simply isn't credible, nor is the fact that he seems to not have suffered a scratch. Being a structural engineer you really have to wonder why he didn't work out the collapse that nearly killed him was a controlled demolition. I laughed hysterically when I read these stories and no doubt many other people have too.
Las Vegas shooting - Miracle survivor of ricocheted bullet - in an interview with Dr Phil, nurse describes bullet ricocheting off her stomach
Christchurch mosque shooting - 9-bullet miracle survivor - Temel Atacocugu was shot nine times and he's wearing a compression bandage! And his scars have healed so quickly we can see he's already wearing socks over them. What a guy!
COVID-19 pandemic -
-- 82 year-old North Staffordshire grandfather makes miracle recovery - with antibiotics. How is this possible if antibiotics are said not to be a cure?
— 90 year-old Washington grandmother makes miracle recovery from "death's door", potato soup being her secret weapon. No images of her suggest she is ill. A 52 year-old MIami man, "gaspin'", "on the brink of death" and thinking his "days were done" recovers miraculously with anti-malarial, chloroquine. Of course, the media is simply reporting what the alleged sufferers feel has helped them ... but surely for such a serious problem if potato soup and chloroquine have not been scientifically proven to help sufferers shouldn't the media be warning viewers?
4. Post-9/11 anthrax attacks - The only image I can find of a sufferer showing signs of anthrax infection is of Pat O'Donnell. The image is low resolution and the lesion does not resemble anthrax infection shown in other images. This snippet on Pat O'Donnell in this Postal Reporter blog 10 years later on his continuing extreme suffering is farfetched when you look at his seeming single lesion (and explains the crudely-named commenters' little sympathy which, judging by the similarity of style and the fact that the comments actually have the title '17 thoughts on “Postal Worker Exposed To Anthrax Facing Different Dilemma Over Transfer Request” ', suggests it is really the perps amusing themselves in very juvenile fashion. I wonder if this sort of writing is in agents' curriculum). See more.
5. Sandy Hook shooting - When asked what he remembered of the day by Dr Oz, a little boy responds: "I remember that a lot of policemen were in the school ... I was ... lying under ... when we were having a drill." A drill (pushed out as real) is precisely what this event event was so they tell us the truth loudly and clearly. In the case of a real event, we would really wonder why they would interview children on TV after such a traumatic event, asking them in a perfectly jolly manner what they remembered of the day. See more.
6. Bologna station bombing - Witness testimony contradicts what we are shown and images not convincing.
7. Manchester bombing - No effort whatsoever is made to make the bomb scene at the 2017 Manchester bombing look in the least like the real scene of a bombing where 22 were killed and 250 were injured and we are only shown the one image (at different levels of zoom and crop) across all media. It's really very scary that you simply cannot find a real bomb scene on the internet any more - the carnage and horror of a real bomb scene are hidden from us because we're only shown scenes of lame anti-terrorist drills which do not in any way resemble a bombing where people are killed and maimed. They certainly do not attempt to approach the hyperrealistic nature of military drills - yes, real bombings do occur, of course, and that's why they use hyperrealistic training in the military but we don't see those bombings splashed across the media 24/7.
8. Boston bombing - We are told Jeff Bauman lost both his legs in the Boston Bombing and in the photo (below the video thumbnail) on this Today show webpage we see him being wheeled along in a wheelchair just after the bombing. Jeff Bauman is really Nick Vogt, who was a soldier who lost his legs in Afghanistan from an improvised explosive device (IED). In the photo, Jeff is holding a fake lower thigh with lower leg to join his upper thigh (in the video thumbnail you can see he has no legs beyond his upper thighs). A person who's just lost his legs could not possibly be wheeled along like this but they shamelessly show us this happening as well as the fake lower thigh with lower leg. (This more gruesome version of Jeff in his wheelchair was originally shown in the New York Times but now they're showing this cropped, tamer (and slightly less obviously faked) version.
9. Sydney Siege - This clip of testimonies from hostages shows contradiction beyond what anyone might consider reasonable and information that is inconsistent with what we would expect in a hostage situation. We have to wonder why the perpetrator holding a shotgun would handle a hostage and be fumbling for quite some time to re-load his gun with Tori standing next to him and, if he were doing that, why Tori wasn't able to wrestle the gun from him at that time and so avoid being shot. We also have to wonder why on earth Monis would have Tori standing next to him and if he were standing next to him then that would not be the normal placement to ask someone to kneel - but then, of course, the first two hostages say he said to kneel (but quite differently from each other) while the third, who says that Tori was standing next to him, is adamant that Monis didn't say that. The convolutions ...
60 Minutes (Channel 9)
Louisa Hope says that he [Monis] calls Tori over and says to him, "Kneel down and put your hands on your head".
Selina Win Pe says, "But what I heard was him [Monis] then going back and saying 'Get down on your knees. Get down on your knees.'"
Channel 7
Marcia Mikhail says, "So he [Monis] picks her up, he helps her off the ground. He picks her up and then he notices Tori still sitting on the bench so he asks Tori to come to him, he goes, "Manager, come over here."
We then see footage of Monis and Tori over which a reporter says, "You can see Tori Johnson here. Monis is behind him, his left hand on Tori's shoulder, his right hand holding a shotgun at Tori's back."
Marcia then says, "He didn't say much to Tori, he just told him to stand next to him and then after that he re-loaded his gun."
Another reporter then says that according to Marcia, Monis fumbled to re-load his gun for quite some time and during that time said not one word. Then:
Reporter: "So Tori wasn't ordered to kneel?"
Marcia: "No, there was nothing said. Absolutely nothing. If he kneeled maybe Monis pushed him down but there was absolutely nothing spoken."
10. Chelsea Manning and the Collateral Murder video - In an interview with ABC Nightline's anchor, Juju Chang, after her alleged 7-year jail sentence, Chelsea Manning says that when she discussed the Collateral Murder video of Apache pilots killing Iraqi civilian journalists with her superior, her superior's response was that it was only one of thousands and thousands of such videos. (Chelsea is clearly an intelligence asset assigned to infiltrate and undermine Wikileaks). We hear 12 call signs in the video and the audio does not match the visuals, suggesting that the audio track is bits of genuine audio stitched together which is poorly matched to faked footage - if they'd been trying they could certainly have done a better job but, as always, they rely on the power of their propaganda techniques to persuade people of their lies - and they work a treat! See more.
Some say that priming us beforehand softens us up to accept the event more readily. I'm not sure if it has that effect but regardless, the evidence that they signal their hoaxing of us before, during and after is indisputable and I think it's very important to recognise it. Not only do they tell us though - they are scrupulous in ensuring that all parts of their hoaxery can easily be identified. They do not fake a single piece of evidence in such a way that it can be mistaken for real and thus used to support their story which is why my challenge to those who support the official story of events is an impossible one to meet - once the magic dust is blown away - just like the Emperor's New Clothes - there is nothing to be found.
While it may be true that their reasoning for "telling us" is in order to push the onus onto us to call them out and be spared karmic repercussions it is easy to infer at least two other good reasons:
- When enlisting their collaborators they can use the fact that they "tell us" to persuade them: "Look, we're really telling them with all these blaring signs so no need to feel bad about duping them." In fact, it's probably a kind of legality although how such an event as 9/11, a Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise involving demolition of massive buildings, fake plane crashes and staged death and injury of 9,000 people pushed out as a real event designed to terrify the US and even global population, would qualify as legal in any way at all is completely beyond me.
- We're talking about POWER here. What better way to manifest power than to push complete nonsense in our faces (above and beyond, for example, their Emperor's New Clothes faked plane crashes and WTC building collapses), know that we will obediently and timidly suck it up and censor those who don't ... and have a great old chortle about it. We can tell by the types of ridiculousness involved in their signs that they have a great old chortle. I cannot help laughing myself.
Hypothesis 1 (H1) - the power elite inform us that it is they who are responsible for their covert operations ... and they have a great old laugh about it
Hypothesis 2 (H2) - the power elite do not inform us that it is they who are responsible for their covert operations; any possible sign is an example of a screwup or coincidence or has some other explanation
Hypothesis 3 (H3) - the power elite do not inform us as they do not perform the covert operations claimed, they are events as presented by the media
The following 10 points support H1 over both H2 and H3
1. 9/11 presages - Many instances of allusions to 9/11 in films and other media dating from the 1940s.
2. 9/11 planes and dead body
- The impossible melting of the plane into the building was required to give credence to the lie of an impact-caused fire bringing the building down, however, having the plane appear to go right through the building was above and beyond the story’s requirements. It so loudly and clearly advertised “HOAX!” In an interview with a FoxNews reporter shown a short time after the building collapses, a witness, Mark Walsh, who is very anomalously smug and smiling after such an horrific event, referred to the site as “Ground Zero”, a term designating the place on earth below the detonation of a massive bomb. How’s that for chutzpah? Mark also describes how he saw the second plane “ream right into the side of the twin tower exploding through the other side.”
- Hani Hanjour was the least-likely terrorist of the band chosen to perform the breathtaking 330 degree manoeuvre into the Pentagon. His alleged flight instructor tells us (in a disguised voice to maintain anonymity) that little Hani would cry when he was instructed to attempt stalls and steep turns.
- We are shown few images of dead people which is not unexpected, however, this particularly gruesome one of a jumper who has hit the pavement (which I do not necessarily advise looking at) is obviously fake and is reminiscent of a scarecrow with the stuffing taken out. See more on fakery of death and injury.
3. Miracle survivors -
Pearl Harbour - Donald Stratton, miracle survivor of severe burns
With the burns he alleged he suffered he could not possibly have inched his way along a 70ft rope, nor re-enlisted after discharge to fight in 5 crucial invasions, nor is there evidence of any part of his ear missing or burns to his face in images of him. See more.
9/11 - The Miracle Survivors
"I felt the walls next to me crack and buckle on top of me,” [Pasquale Buzzelli] says. Suddenly, he seemed to be in free fall, and the walls seemed to separate and move away from him.
Maybe two hours later, he regained consciousness on a slab of concrete 180 feet below the 22nd floor. (He may be the source of the rumor that someone surfed the collapse and lived.)"
When you watch the tower collapse this simply isn't credible, nor is the fact that he seems to not have suffered a scratch. Being a structural engineer you really have to wonder why he didn't work out the collapse that nearly killed him was a controlled demolition. I laughed hysterically when I read these stories and no doubt many other people have too.
Las Vegas shooting - Miracle survivor of ricocheted bullet - in an interview with Dr Phil, nurse describes bullet ricocheting off her stomach
Christchurch mosque shooting - 9-bullet miracle survivor - Temel Atacocugu was shot nine times and he's wearing a compression bandage! And his scars have healed so quickly we can see he's already wearing socks over them. What a guy!
COVID-19 pandemic -
-- 82 year-old North Staffordshire grandfather makes miracle recovery - with antibiotics. How is this possible if antibiotics are said not to be a cure?
— 90 year-old Washington grandmother makes miracle recovery from "death's door", potato soup being her secret weapon. No images of her suggest she is ill. A 52 year-old MIami man, "gaspin'", "on the brink of death" and thinking his "days were done" recovers miraculously with anti-malarial, chloroquine. Of course, the media is simply reporting what the alleged sufferers feel has helped them ... but surely for such a serious problem if potato soup and chloroquine have not been scientifically proven to help sufferers shouldn't the media be warning viewers?
4. Post-9/11 anthrax attacks - The only image I can find of a sufferer showing signs of anthrax infection is of Pat O'Donnell. The image is low resolution and the lesion does not resemble anthrax infection shown in other images. This snippet on Pat O'Donnell in this Postal Reporter blog 10 years later on his continuing extreme suffering is farfetched when you look at his seeming single lesion (and explains the crudely-named commenters' little sympathy which, judging by the similarity of style and the fact that the comments actually have the title '17 thoughts on “Postal Worker Exposed To Anthrax Facing Different Dilemma Over Transfer Request” ', suggests it is really the perps amusing themselves in very juvenile fashion. I wonder if this sort of writing is in agents' curriculum). See more.
5. Sandy Hook shooting - When asked what he remembered of the day by Dr Oz, a little boy responds: "I remember that a lot of policemen were in the school ... I was ... lying under ... when we were having a drill." A drill (pushed out as real) is precisely what this event event was so they tell us the truth loudly and clearly. In the case of a real event, we would really wonder why they would interview children on TV after such a traumatic event, asking them in a perfectly jolly manner what they remembered of the day. See more.
6. Bologna station bombing - Witness testimony contradicts what we are shown and images not convincing.
7. Manchester bombing - No effort whatsoever is made to make the bomb scene at the 2017 Manchester bombing look in the least like the real scene of a bombing where 22 were killed and 250 were injured and we are only shown the one image (at different levels of zoom and crop) across all media. It's really very scary that you simply cannot find a real bomb scene on the internet any more - the carnage and horror of a real bomb scene are hidden from us because we're only shown scenes of lame anti-terrorist drills which do not in any way resemble a bombing where people are killed and maimed. They certainly do not attempt to approach the hyperrealistic nature of military drills - yes, real bombings do occur, of course, and that's why they use hyperrealistic training in the military but we don't see those bombings splashed across the media 24/7.
8. Boston bombing - We are told Jeff Bauman lost both his legs in the Boston Bombing and in the photo (below the video thumbnail) on this Today show webpage we see him being wheeled along in a wheelchair just after the bombing. Jeff Bauman is really Nick Vogt, who was a soldier who lost his legs in Afghanistan from an improvised explosive device (IED). In the photo, Jeff is holding a fake lower thigh with lower leg to join his upper thigh (in the video thumbnail you can see he has no legs beyond his upper thighs). A person who's just lost his legs could not possibly be wheeled along like this but they shamelessly show us this happening as well as the fake lower thigh with lower leg. (This more gruesome version of Jeff in his wheelchair was originally shown in the New York Times but now they're showing this cropped, tamer (and slightly less obviously faked) version.
9. Sydney Siege - This clip of testimonies from hostages shows contradiction beyond what anyone might consider reasonable and information that is inconsistent with what we would expect in a hostage situation. We have to wonder why the perpetrator holding a shotgun would handle a hostage and be fumbling for quite some time to re-load his gun with Tori standing next to him and, if he were doing that, why Tori wasn't able to wrestle the gun from him at that time and so avoid being shot. We also have to wonder why on earth Monis would have Tori standing next to him and if he were standing next to him then that would not be the normal placement to ask someone to kneel - but then, of course, the first two hostages say he said to kneel (but quite differently from each other) while the third, who says that Tori was standing next to him, is adamant that Monis didn't say that. The convolutions ...
60 Minutes (Channel 9)
Louisa Hope says that he [Monis] calls Tori over and says to him, "Kneel down and put your hands on your head".
Selina Win Pe says, "But what I heard was him [Monis] then going back and saying 'Get down on your knees. Get down on your knees.'"
Channel 7
Marcia Mikhail says, "So he [Monis] picks her up, he helps her off the ground. He picks her up and then he notices Tori still sitting on the bench so he asks Tori to come to him, he goes, "Manager, come over here."
We then see footage of Monis and Tori over which a reporter says, "You can see Tori Johnson here. Monis is behind him, his left hand on Tori's shoulder, his right hand holding a shotgun at Tori's back."
Marcia then says, "He didn't say much to Tori, he just told him to stand next to him and then after that he re-loaded his gun."
Another reporter then says that according to Marcia, Monis fumbled to re-load his gun for quite some time and during that time said not one word. Then:
Reporter: "So Tori wasn't ordered to kneel?"
Marcia: "No, there was nothing said. Absolutely nothing. If he kneeled maybe Monis pushed him down but there was absolutely nothing spoken."
10. Chelsea Manning and the Collateral Murder video - In an interview with ABC Nightline's anchor, Juju Chang, after her alleged 7-year jail sentence, Chelsea Manning says that when she discussed the Collateral Murder video of Apache pilots killing Iraqi civilian journalists with her superior, her superior's response was that it was only one of thousands and thousands of such videos. (Chelsea is clearly an intelligence asset assigned to infiltrate and undermine Wikileaks). We hear 12 call signs in the video and the audio does not match the visuals, suggesting that the audio track is bits of genuine audio stitched together which is poorly matched to faked footage - if they'd been trying they could certainly have done a better job but, as always, they rely on the power of their propaganda techniques to persuade people of their lies - and they work a treat! See more.
Widget is loading comments...
Proudly powered by Weebly