PEARL HARBOUR - 7 dECEMBER, 1941
On the 70th anniversary of Pearl Harbour, the attack that propelled America into the Second World War, a declassified memo shows that the Japanese surprise attack was expected.
Pearl Harbour memo shows US warned of Japanese attack, The Telegraph, 30 March 2019
... Sure it was known in advance and why would the US allow their soldiers and civilians to be killed when they could avoid it and simply fake the dead and injured to provide the reason to enter the war.
Pearl Harbour memo shows US warned of Japanese attack, The Telegraph, 30 March 2019
... Sure it was known in advance and why would the US allow their soldiers and civilians to be killed when they could avoid it and simply fake the dead and injured to provide the reason to enter the war.
Wikipedia states that in total, 2,403 Americans were killed and 1,143 were wounded.
The argument for Pearl Harbour being a complete psyop, that is, in reality simply bombing of an evacuated area (similar to 9/11) rather than either a kind of semi false-flag as a result of lack of action despite advance warning or a straight-out surprise attack are:
The lack of images even attempting to show convincing signs of injury is a sign the power elite almost always give us when they're hoaxing us and the miracle survivor/escape story is pretty common too.
We can see a parallel of the lack of convincing signs of injury and the miracle survivor story in 9/11 - see Points 6 and 8.
Unconvincing images of injured and tending to injured
The images below show no sign of injury or death. The photo at bottom left shows a man being tended to by three people including a man with a cigarette casually hanging out of his mouth. There is no sign of injury, one man (apart from the three tending to the injured man) is squatting and a number of people are standing around. This photo does not fit a situation where almost 2,500 people have just been killed and over 1,000 injured. The photos that include signs of bombing are perfectly compatible with a situation where a bombing has occurred and everyone is brought in afterwards for the photo ops – same for Bologna 1980 and Mogadishu 2017.
The argument for Pearl Harbour being a complete psyop, that is, in reality simply bombing of an evacuated area (similar to 9/11) rather than either a kind of semi false-flag as a result of lack of action despite advance warning or a straight-out surprise attack are:
- There are no images of injured that show clear signs of injury
- The images shown of tending to the injured are unconvincing
- There are clear signs of fakery in the footage
- There is at least one survivor story that has zero credibility, that of Donald Stratton and other survivor stories are a little lacking in credibility too.
The lack of images even attempting to show convincing signs of injury is a sign the power elite almost always give us when they're hoaxing us and the miracle survivor/escape story is pretty common too.
We can see a parallel of the lack of convincing signs of injury and the miracle survivor story in 9/11 - see Points 6 and 8.
Unconvincing images of injured and tending to injured
The images below show no sign of injury or death. The photo at bottom left shows a man being tended to by three people including a man with a cigarette casually hanging out of his mouth. There is no sign of injury, one man (apart from the three tending to the injured man) is squatting and a number of people are standing around. This photo does not fit a situation where almost 2,500 people have just been killed and over 1,000 injured. The photos that include signs of bombing are perfectly compatible with a situation where a bombing has occurred and everyone is brought in afterwards for the photo ops – same for Bologna 1980 and Mogadishu 2017.
Indications of fakery in the footage
In this 9-minute video analysts, Jason Laufenberg and Ronnie Harris, point out obvious fakery in the filming.
Unconvincing survivor story
Donald Stratton’s survivor story is not credible.
With the burns he alleged he suffered he could not possibly have inched his way along a 70ft rope, nor re-enlisted after discharge to fight in 5 crucial invasions, nor is there evidence of any part of his ear missing or burns to his face in images of him.
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/740478/Pearl-Harbour-attack-anniversary-survivor-memoir-Donald-Stratton
Other anomalies
On the pearlharbor.org website survivor stories are posted with claims of survival that seem a little odd and there is a lack of photos similar to the lack of photos we see on the CNN 9/11 Memorial site.
We are told Patrick McIntyre passed away at 96 but there is no photo apart from one of a rather anonymous-looking one taken of him around the time of the attack. No recent photo?
In this 9-minute video analysts, Jason Laufenberg and Ronnie Harris, point out obvious fakery in the filming.
Unconvincing survivor story
Donald Stratton’s survivor story is not credible.
With the burns he alleged he suffered he could not possibly have inched his way along a 70ft rope, nor re-enlisted after discharge to fight in 5 crucial invasions, nor is there evidence of any part of his ear missing or burns to his face in images of him.
https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/740478/Pearl-Harbour-attack-anniversary-survivor-memoir-Donald-Stratton
Other anomalies
On the pearlharbor.org website survivor stories are posted with claims of survival that seem a little odd and there is a lack of photos similar to the lack of photos we see on the CNN 9/11 Memorial site.
We are told Patrick McIntyre passed away at 96 but there is no photo apart from one of a rather anonymous-looking one taken of him around the time of the attack. No recent photo?